WP/21952/2018 of M/s. Sure Yah Indane Vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Marketing Division) on 21 December 2025

1. M/S. SURE YAH INDANE, LPG DISTRIBUTOR OF INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITE D. NO. 13-5-10/D, VALLIPALLI VARI STREET, KOVVUR WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR TANETI SURYA KUMAR, S/O. BABI SAROJINI

...PETITIONER AND

1. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED MARKETING DIVISION, SOUTHERN REGION INDIAN OIL BHAVAN, 139, NUNGAMBAKKAM HIGH ROAD CHENNAI -600034, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

2. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER CONTRACTS, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, INDIANOIL BHAVAN 139, NUNGAMBAKKAM HIGH ROAD, CHENNAI -600034

3. THE CHIEF PLANT MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED LPG BOTTLING PLANT, J. N. PHARMA CITY (S.O.) IDA PARAVADA (MANDAL), VISAKHAPATNAM

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring action of the Respondents in calling for written consent vide letter dated 21.06.2018 from the interested LPG Distributors and existing packed transporters of Vizag BP without allocating to balance un-

JS,J W.P.No.21952/2018

allocated truck in ascending order as per the Tender Evaluation Criteria of Tender No. SRCC/PT/132/TAPSO/2017-18, in not allocating petitioners trucks under MSE Category in the Tender called vide Tender No. SRCC/PT/132/TAPSO/2017-18, in not allocating sufficient numbers of trucks to the SC member as per 15 percentage reservation in this tender and unfulfilled reserved number from the previous tender and in allocating trucks not registered in State in which bottling plant is located contrary to the conditions in Tender No. SRCC/PT/132/TAPSO/2017-18 as illegal, discriminative, arbitrary, malafidy, mockery, contrary to the terms and conditions of Tender No. SRCC/PT/132/TAPSO/2017-18 and in violation of Article 14 and 19(g) of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the Respondents to re-evaluate the tenders duly following the tender evaluation criteria and other terms and condition of the Tender No. SRCC/PT/132/TAPSO/2017-18 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to allocate any new truck other than the trucks offered in Tender No. SRCC/PT/ 132/TAPSO/2017-18 pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. S.V.S.S.SIVA RAM

JS,J W.P.No.21952/2018

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 22.12.2025

KAS

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 21952/2018

Dated: 22.12.2025 KAS