Andhra Pradesh High Court

FCA/203/2009 of SOORAPU SARASWATHY Vs SOORAPU VISHNUMURTHY on 9 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3563] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 203/2009 Between: 1.

APHC010484492009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO

FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 203/2009

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SOORAPU SARASWATHY, W/O.SOORAPU VISHNUMURTHY, HINDU HOUSEHOLD R/O.DHARMAVARAM VILLAGE, ETCHERLA MANDAL,

...APPELLANT AND

1. SOORAPU VISHNUMURTHY, S/o.lae Surayya, Hindu Cultivation R/o.Balaga, Srikakulam Municipality.

...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against ordersallow the appeal preferred by the appellant granting decree of divorce by setting side the order and decretal order passed by the Family Court, Srikakulam passed in FCGOP No.8/2008 dated 18.03.2009 as erroneous with costs of appellant throughout IA NO: 2 OF 2009(FCAMP 25018 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:

1. K S GOPALA KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent:

1. D KRISHNA MURTHY The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.203 of 2009 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

Learned counsels appearing on either side, on instructions would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this appeal, this Family Court Appeal has become infructuous.

2. In view of the above factual position, in our considered view, this appeal is liable to be dismissed as infructuous.

3. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.

4. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

______________________________ JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 10/12/2025 SCS

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.203 of 2009

Date: 10.12.2025

SCS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead