Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/13160/2020 of R.Padmavathi Vs Union of India on 8 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 13160/2020 Between: 1. R.PADMAVATHI, W/O LATE VEERAPPA AGE 62 YEAR ,
APHC010202192020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. R.PADMAVATHI, W/O LATE VEERAPPA AGE 62 YEAR , R/O.H.NO.64-62 A, S.NAGAPPA STREET, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
2. R.VIJAYA CHANDRABABU, S/O LATE VEERAPPA AGE 32 YEAR H.NO.64-62 A, S.NAGAPPA STREET, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, , REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, CONSUMER AFFAIRS FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION, NEW DELHI
2. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, , ZONAL OFFICE, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NO.3, HADDOWS ROAD, CHENNAI 600006
3. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, NO.3, HADDOWS ROAD, CHENNAI 600006
4. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, REGIONAL OFFICE, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
5. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS DISTRICT MANAGER, DISTRICT OFFICE KURNOOL.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in rejecting the case of the petitioner No.2 for compassionate appointment under Dependent Quota due to the death of his father who dies in harness without giving any speaking order in Ltr.No.RPI/32(4)/2013/Vol.VI dt.18.10.2016 while including the names of the persons whose fathers death taken place subsequent to the death of the petitioners husband / father and appointing 4 persons whose fathers death was subsequent to the death of the petitioners husband / father without giving specific reason as illegal and arbitrary and violates Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently declare that the petitioner is entitled for appointment on compassionate grounds as per his qualification and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue Interim Direction directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds duly considering his representation dt.2.7.2020 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P V RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
2. O UDAYA KUMAR
The Court made the following Order:
Sri P.V. Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioners filed a letter before the Registry seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 09.12.2025 MSI
Date: 09.12.2025 MSI