Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/1408/2016 of N.VIJAYAKUMARI VIJAYAWADA & 12 OTHERS Vs CHAIRMAN NC OF SCHEDULE TRIBE NEW DELHI & 2 OTHERS on 7 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1408/2016 Between: 1. N.VIJAYAKUMARI VIJAYAWADA & 12 OTHERS, - ...PETITIONER AND

APHC010634712016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 1408/2016

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. N.VIJAYAKUMARI VIJAYAWADA & 12 OTHERS, -

...PETITIONER AND

1. CHAIRMAN NC OF SCHEDULE TRIBE NEW DELHI 2 OTHERS, -

...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 1776 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 & 2 to consider the representations of the Petitioners dated 06-12-2014 and 14-01-2015 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 4 OF 2016(WPMP 71079 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. J RAMMOHAN RAO

JS, J W.P.No.1408 of 2016

Counsel for the Respondent:

1. ANJALI AGARWAL

2. TENEPALLI NIRANJAN ( SC FOR CENT GOVT) )

JS, J W.P.No.1408 of 2016

The Court made the following Order:

There was no representation on 24.09.2025, 17.11.2025 and 01.12.2025. Therefore the matter was posted under the caption “for dismissal”.

Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioners. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioners is not interested to prosecute the case.

Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand dismissed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 08.12.2025 MSI/RSD

JS, J W.P.No.1408 of 2016

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 1408/2016

Dated: 08.12.2025 MSI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead