Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/325/2013 of GANGAMMA (DIED) AND 2 OTHERS Vs UNDRAVARAPU VEERAMMA (DIED) AND 5 OTHERS on 4 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 325/2013 Between: 1. GANGAMMA (DIED) AND 2 OTHERS, - 2. PENEMAKA
APHC010014602013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 325/2013
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. GANGAMMA (DIED) AND 2 OTHERS, -
2. PENEMAKA BHUSANAM,, S/O. VENKANNA, MECHANIC, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT.
3. JUTHICA ASTEERAMMA,, W/O. YESAIAH, HOUSEWIFE R/O. RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT(S) AND
1. UNDRAVARAPU VEERAMMA DIED AND 5 OTHERS, -
2. PYMADAILLA MUSALAMMA DIED, -
3. PYDAMALLA GANESH SERVADAM, S/O. GANEYYA, CULTIVATION, SAMPATHANAGARAM, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT.
4. PYDAMALLA GANESH, S/O. GANTAIAH, CULTIVATION, SAMPATHANAGARAM, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT.
5. PYDAMALLA SRINU, S/O. GANTAIAH, CULTIVATION, SAMPATHANAGARAM, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT.
6. PYDAMALLA RAMANA, S/O. GANTAIAH, CULTIVATION, SAMPATHANAGARAM, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against orders
JS,J C.M.A.No.325/2013
IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CMAMP 24268 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 695 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 364 days in representing the above CMA in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. M SIVANANDA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. JS,J C.M.A.No.325/2013
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
Though the Registry sent notices to the appellants, the same were returned with postal endorsement “Insufficient Address”.
Perused the docket proceedings.
This Court has not granted stay of the proceedings in E.A.No.53 of 2010 in O.A.No.102 of 1971 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry.
In view of the same, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as non-prosecution. However, it is open to the appellants to file an application, if necessary. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
Date: 05.12.2025 KAS
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 325/2013
Date: 05.12.2025 KAS