Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/28556/2013 of SUGGU NIRMALA, SRIKAKULAM DIST Vs PRL SECY HOME DEPT, HYD & 10 OT on 4 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO.28556 of 2013 ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.3 to 6 in harassing the petitioner’s husband i.e., Mr.Suggu Rami Reddy, at the instance of respondent No.7 by registering

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

WRIT PETITION NO.28556 of 2013

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.3 to 6 in harassing the petitioner’s husband i.e., Mr.Suggu Rami Reddy, at the instance of respondent No.7 by registering false case and arresting her husband in the said vexatious case as illegal, arbitrary, high handed and violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and sought consequent direction to the respondent Nos.3 to 6 not to arrest her husband in the case registered against him.

2. On 21.06.2024, this Court observed that the learned counsel for the petitioner was elevated as a Judge of this Court and accordingly, directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. Until 26.09.2025, there is no response from the petitioner. However, on 26.09.2025, this Court directed the Registrar (Judicial) to verify whether the notice is served on the petitioner or not and to submit a report. Accordingly, the Registrar (Judicial) submitted a report, dated 09.10.2025 wherein, it is stated that to ascertain the status of the postal article/notice, a letter, dated 08.10.2025 has been addressed to the Head Post Master, Head Post Office, Guntur and in turn, vide letter, dated 09.10.2025, the Superintendent of the Post Office, Guntur Division informed that the registered letter was delivered to the addressee i.e., the petitioner herein.

3. It appears that in spite of receiving notice from the Court, there is no appearance for the petitioner either in person or through an Advocate to prosecute her case.

4. The Writ Petition is pertaining to the year 2013 and in view of the above factual position, it appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case.

5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non prosecution. No costs.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

_____________________________

JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 05.12.2025 PKR

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

WRIT PETITION NO.28556 of 2013

Date: 05.12.2025 PKR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead