Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/3310/2025 of PATHURI JAYA LAKSHMI Vs MANCHINENI UMA DEVI on 4 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION Between: 1. PATHURI JAYA LAKSHMI, W/O LATE KRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O G- OLD PANCHAYAT OFFICE, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA 1. MANCHINENI UMA DEVI, W/O DHARMA
APHC010627452025
IN TH
FRIDAY
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
CIVIL R
Between:
1. PATHURI JAYA LA
74 YEARS, R/O G-
OLD PANCHAYAT
1. MANCHINENI UMA
YEARS, PROPERT
RURAL MANDAL
2. MACHINENI HARIS
YEARS, PROPERT
NEAR RAMALAYA
VILLAGE, VIJAYAW
3. MANCHINENI RAM
ABOUT 32 YEARS
ARCADE,
NEAR
NIDAMANURU VILL
Petition under Artic
circumstances stated in
pleased toPleased to SE
of 2024 in O.S. No. 462 o
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Y, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER
THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND
REVISION PETITION NO: 3310/2025
AKSHMI, W/O LATE KRISHNA RAO
-4, GROUND FLOOR, PATHURI TO
OFFICE, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA
AND
A DEVI, W/O DHARMA RAO, AGE
TIES, R/O NIDAMANURU VILLAGE,
SH, S/O VISVESWARA RAO, AGE
TIES, R/O FLAT, NO GF-5, ISWAR
AM, THOTAKURA VARI STREET,
WADA.
MA KRISHNA, S/O VISVESWARA
S. PROPERTIES, R/O FLAT, NO GF
RAMALAYAM,
THOTAKURA
VA
LAGE, VIJAYAWADA.
...RES
le 227 of the Constitution of India,pra
n the grounds filed herein,the High
ET-ASIDE the order dated. 16.09.2025
of 2015 on the file of the VII Additiona DESH
DRANATH ROY
AGED ABOUT
OWERS, NEAR
A-5
...PETITIONER
ED ABOUT 70
VIJAYAWADA
ED ABOUT 34
RYA ARCADE,
NIDAMANURU
RAO AGED
F-5, ISWARYA
ARI
STREET,
SPONDENT(S):
aying that in the
Court may be
5 in I.A. No. 770
l District Judge,
CMR,J
C.R.P.No.3310 of 2025
Vijayawada, and allow the above Civil Revision Petition in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant STAY of all further proceedings in O.S. No. 462 of 2015 on the file of the VII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.P RAJASEKHAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
CMR,J
C.R.P.No.3310 of 2025
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the civil revision petition became infructuous.
2. Therefore, recording the aforesaid submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Date: 05.12.2025 MDP