Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/3597/2022 of DAMACHARLA SREENIVASARAO Vs SRI GOPALA KRISHNA DWIVEDA on 4 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3597/2022 Between: 1. DAMACHARLA SREENIVASARAO, S/O.SAMBASIVARAO,

APHC010414802022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3597/2022

Between:

1. DAMACHARLA SREENIVASARAO, S/O.SAMBASIVARAO, AGED.53

YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.1-15, BHIMAVARAM VILLAGE, SATTENAPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SRI

GOPALA

KRISHNA

DWIVEDA,

PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. SRI KONA SASIDHAR, COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND

RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH, NH -16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. SRI SIVA SANKAR LOTHETI, DISTRICT COLLECTOR (PANCHAYAT

WING), GUNTUR/PALNADU DISTRICT

4. SRI Z RAMESH, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

5. MR CH KALYAN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS THE GUDIPUDI GRAM

PANCHAYAT

REP

BY

ITS

EXECUTIVE

AUTHORITY

CUM

PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GUDIPUDI VILLAGE SATTENAPALLI

MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT.

6. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE

DEPARTMENT,

A.P.SECRETARIAT,

VELAGAPUDI,

AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. R 6 LEAVE GRANTED AS PER

COURT ORDER DT.16/09/2022. VIDE IA NO.1 OF 2022 IN CC

NO.3597 OF 2022.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein under the provisions of Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, for willful and deliberate violation of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 29.10.2021 made in W.P.No.24863 of 2021 and pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to make Respondent No.6 herein as a party Respondent No.6 to the above Contempt Case, in the interests of justice and pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Dispense with the Order in WP.No. 24863 of 2021. The Certified copy of the order is currently not available but the copy of the same is filed here with, the original copy may be filed in due course. Hence the filing of the certified copy of Order may kindly be dispensed with for the present.

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with my personal appearance on 08-05-2023 in CC No.

3597 of 2022 as directed by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 14-03-2023 in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. T VENU GOPAL

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. ASHOK RAM V

2. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI

3. TENNETI PRABHU DASU

4. G VENKATA REDDY

The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

CONTEMPT CASE No.3597 of 2022

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Contempt Case has been filed complaining the willful disobedience of the respondents in implementing the order dated 29.10.2021 in W.P.No.24863 of 2021.

2. During the course of hearing today, both the learned counsels would submit that the order of the Court is complied with and hence, further adjudication in this case is not required.

3. In view of the above factual position, this Court is of the view that, no further adjudication is required in the present Contempt Case.

4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.

5. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

Date: 05.12.2025 SCS

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

CONTEMPT CASE No.3597 of 2022

Dt.05.12.2025 SCS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead