Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/304/2022 of KAKANI VEERANJANEYULU Vs SRI GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI on 4 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 304/2022 Between: 1. KAKANI VEERANJANEYULU, S/O. HANUMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.
APHC010028462022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 304/2022
Between:
1. KAKANI VEERANJANEYULU, S/O. HANUMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 50
YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 2-15/2, KONDALARAYUNIPALEM, PUVVADA
VILLAGE, NUZENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. GANGINENI CHANDRASEKHAR RAO,, S/O. PEDDA PICHAIAH, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
R/O.
DAKSHINAM
BAZAR,
KAMBHAMPADU
VILLAGE,
NUZENDLA
MANDAL,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT, A.P.
3. KUNTA KOTI REDDY,, C/O. KUNTA NANDI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43
YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 3-87, GOLLAPALEM, TALARLAPALLI VILLAGE, NUZENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
4. SOMEPALLI BRAHMAIAH,, S/O. SOMEPALLI MAHANANDI, AGED
ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 1-36, PAMIDIPADU VILLAGE, NUZENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
5. NAMBULA GURUNADHA RAO,, S/O. NAMBULA KOTAIAH, AGED
ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 2-129, PAMIDIPADU VILLAGE, NUZENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
6. YARRABIKKI VENKATRAO,, S/O. SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 44
YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 2-110, MULAKALURU VILLAGE, NUZENDLA
MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. SRI GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR THE
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL
DEPARTMENT (R.D-II), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. SRI
ADITYANATH
DAS,
SPECIAL
CHIEF
SECRETARY
TO
GOVERNMENT, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, (RURAL
DEVELOPMENT), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
R 2 DELETED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.02/03/2022
3. SRI KONA SASIDHAR, COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND
RURAL DEVELOPMENT, NO. 12-47, P.V.S. ICON, PATHURU CROSS
ROAD, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT,E A.P.
4. SRI NAGENDRA NATH SINHA, UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS
SECRETARY
MINISTRY
OF
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT,
KRISHI
BHAVAN, NEW DELHI,
5. SRI ASHOK KUMAR, THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, KRISHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.
6. SRI VIVEK YADAV, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR.
7. SRI DOVA CHAITANYA, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA
PARISHAD, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
8. SRI R KESAVA REDDY, THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to take cognizance of the contempt committed by the contemnors/ respondents herein and punish them under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for utter disobedience and disregard shown to the Interim Orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 05.10.2021 passed in W.P. No.14371 of 2021 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI
2. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
3.
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE No.304 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case has been filed complaining the willful disobedience of the respondents in implementing the order dated 05.10.2021 in W.P. No.14371 of 2021.
2. During the course of hearing today, both the learned counsels would submit that the order of the Court is complied with and hence, further adjudication in this case is not required.
3. In view of the above factual position, this Court is of the view that, no further adjudication is required in the present Contempt Case.
4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date: 05.12.2025 SCS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE No.304 of 2022
Dt.05.12.2025 SCS