Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/934/2022 of Eluri Gopala Rao Vs Sri.Gopala Krishna Dwivedi, on 4 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 934/2022 Between: 1. ELURI GOPALA RAO, S/O ELURI KOTAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RIO
APHC010122182022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 934/2022
Between:
1. ELURI GOPALA RAO, S/O ELURI KOTAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RIO MUNDLAPADU, PENUGANCHIPROLU MANDAL, KRISHNA
DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI GOPALA KRISHNA DWIVEDI, S/O.NOT KNOWN, PRESENTLY
WORKING
AS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
TO
GOVERNMENT,
PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI KONA SASIDHAR, S/O.NOT KNOWN, PRESENTLY WORKING AS
COMMISSIONER
FOR
PANCHAYAT
RAJ
AND
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT,
GOVERNMENT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH, NH-16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. SRI A VENKATESWARARAO, S/O.NOT KNOWN, PRESENTLY
WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (PRI), BUNDAR ROAD, OPP- PWD GROUNDS, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. NALLANI NARASIMHA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, PRESENTLY
WORKING AS PANCHAYATH SECRETARY FOR MUNDLAPADU
GRAMA PANCHAYATH PENUGANCHIPROLU MANDAL, KRISHNA
DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of order dated 08.11.2021 passed in W.P.No.25804 of 2021 on the file of this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V.N.V.SURYA DATTU
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
2. ;
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE No.934 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case has been filed complaining the willful disobedience of the respondents in implementing the order dated 08.11.2021 in W.P.No.25804 of 2021.
2. During the course of hearing today, both the learned counsels would submit that the order of the Court is complied with and hence, further adjudication in this case is not required.
3. In view of the above factual position, this Court is of the view that, no further adjudication is required in the present Contempt Case.
4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date: 05.12.2025 SCS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE No.934 of 2022
Dt.05.12.2025 SCS