Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/278/2022 of KANCHUMATI PERAIAH Vs SRI GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI on 4 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 278/2022 Between: 1. KANCHUMATI PERAIAH, S/O. HANUMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. D.
APHC010028452022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 278/2022
Between:
1. KANCHUMATI PERAIAH, S/O. HANUMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 56
YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 4-3, VETARAYUNI APPAPURAM, MARELLAVARI
PALEM VILLAGE, NUZENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. GANGINENI ANJANEYULU,, S/O. VENKATARAO, AGED ABOUT 61
YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 1-1, NUZENDLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
3. RODDA NAGI REDDY,, S/O. RAMANJANEYA REDDY, AGED ABOUT
42 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 1-60, UPPALAPADU, TELLABADU VILLAGE, NUZENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
4. KANNEBOYINA VENKATESWARLU,, S/O. LATE TULASAYYA, AGED
ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 3-10, PATHAREDDYPALEM, PUTCHANUTHALA
VILLAGE,
NUZENDLA
MANDAL,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT, A.P.
5. LAGADAPATI HANUMANTHA RAO,, S/O. GALEYYA, AGED ABOUT 60
YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 2-131, RAMALAYAM BAZAR, NEAR SCHOOL, KOTHA
JADDAVARI
PALEM
VILLAGE,
NUZENDLA
MANDAL,
GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
6. POKURI RAMAIAH,, S/O. POKURI VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED
ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 4-104, PATHA CHERUVU
KOMMUPALEM VILLAGE, NUZENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. SRI GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL
DEPARTMENT (R.D-II), 5TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, ROOM
NO.107, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, 2ND BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, ROOM NO. 290, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. SRI KONA SASIDHAR, IAS, COMMISSIONER, PR AND RD, O/0.
COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, D.
NO.12-47, PVS ICON, PATHURU CROSS ROAD, TADEPALLI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH
4. SRI TEJ RAM, THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, GOVERNMENT
OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, KRISHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.
5. SRI VIVEK YADAV, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR.
6. SRI DOVA CHAITANYA, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA
PARISHAD, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
7. SRI R KESAVA REDDY, THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to take cognizance of the contempt committed by the Contemnors/Respondents herein
and
punish
them
with
maximum
imprisonment under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for utter disobedience and disregard shown to the Orders passed by the Hon'ble A.P. High Court dated 05.10.2021
passed in W.P. No. 15023 of 2021 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. C SUMON-10224/AP/877/2003
2. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI
3. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE No.278 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case has been filed complaining the willful disobedience of the respondents in implementing the order dated 05.10.2021 in W.P. No. 15023 of 2021.
2. During the course of hearing today, both the learned counsels would submit that the order of the Court is complied with and hence, further adjudication in this case is not required.
3. In view of the above factual position, this Court is of the view that, no further adjudication is required in the present Contempt Case.
4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date: 05.12.2025 SCS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE No.278 of 2022
Dt.05.12.2025 SCS