Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/618/2022 of Mundru Subbarao, Vs Sri Gopal Krishna Dwivedi, on 4 December 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 618/2022 Between: 1. MUNDRU SUBBARAO,, S/O. MUNDRU GALAIAH, AGED
APHC010521362021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 618/2022
Between:
1. MUNDRU SUBBARAO,, S/O. MUNDRU GALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56
YEARS, R/O. 1-112, MURTHIJAPURAM, NUZENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL
DEPARTMENT (R.D-II), 5TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, ROOM
NO.107, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, 2ND BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, ROOM NO. 290, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. SRI TEJ RAM, THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, GOVERNMENT
OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, KRISHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.
4. SRI VIVEK YADAV, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR.
5. SRI K S CHITTIBABU, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, MURTHIJAPURAM
PANCHAYAT, NUZENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
6. SRI VENKATA REDDY, THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT
OFFICER, NUZENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
7. SRI KONA SASIDHAR IAS, COMMISSIONER, PR AND RD, 0/0.
COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, D.
NO.12-47, PVS ICON, PATHURU CROSS ROAD, TADEPALLI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH.
8. SRI GIRIJA SANKAR IAS, FORMER COMMISSIONER, PR AND RD, 0/0.
COMMISSIONER,
PANCHAYAT
RAJ
AND
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT, D. NO.12-47, PVS ICON, PATHURU CROSS ROAD, TADEPALLI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. RR 6 TO 8 LEAVE
GRANTED AS PER COURT ORDER DT 03/03/2022 VIDE IA NO,1 OF
20222 IN CC NO.618 OF 2022
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to take cognizance of the contempt committed by the Contemnors/Respondents herein
and
punish
them
with
maximum
imprisonment under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for utter disobedience and disregard shown to the Orders passed by the Hon'ble A.P. High Court dated 05.10.2021
passed in W.P. No. 19005 of 2021 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioners to file the Contempt against the respondent authorities numbers 6 to 8 as respondents for disobedience and disregard shown against the passed in WP.No. 19005 of 2021 dated 05.10.2021 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with my personal appearance on 26-04-2022 in CC 618/2022
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to implead the Proposed Respondents as Respondent Nos.9 to 14 in the main Contempt Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI
2. ASHOK RAM V
3. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE No.618 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case has been filed complaining the willful disobedience of the respondents in implementing the order dated 05.10.2021 in W.P. No.19005 of 2021.
2. During the course of hearing today, both the learned counsels would submit that the order of the Court is complied with and hence, further adjudication in this case is not required.
3. In view of the above factual position, this Court is of the view that, no further adjudication is required in the present Contempt Case.
4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date: 05.12.2025 SCS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE No.618 of 2022
Dt.05.12.2025 SCS