Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/5613/2022 of KALAM VENKATESWARA REDDY Vs GOPALA KRISHNA DWIVEDI,I.A.S on 4 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5613/2022 Between: 1. KALAM VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/O. SUBBA REDDY AGED 43 YEARS, OCC
APHC010646022022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5613/2022
Between:
1. KALAM VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/O. SUBBA REDDY AGED 43
YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O. 2-37, RAMALAYAM TEMPLE, DUPADU
VILLAGE TRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. GOPALA KRISHNA DWIVEDI I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT
OF
AP
PANCHAYAT
RAJ
AND
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI KONA SASIDHAR IAS, COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND
RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF AP NH - 16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. SRI DINESH KUMAR I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR (PANCHAYAT
WING) PRAKASAM DISTRICTAT ONGOLE
4. Y RAMESH BABU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DEPARTMENT
MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
5. SRI P MOSHE, PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS AND
PROJECTS ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
6. SRI YERRA SRINIVASA RAO, SECRETARY, DUPADU GRAM
PANCHAYAT, DUPADU VILLAGE TRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience
to the order dated 03.12.2021 passed in W.P. No. 28549 of 2021 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of the copy of the order dated 03.12.2021
passed in W.P. No. 28549 of 2021 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to add the proposed respondent No. 7 as respondent in C.C. No.
5613 of 2022 in WP No. 28549 of 2021 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased plesed to dispense with my personal appearance on 14-03-2023 in the above contempt case in the interest of justice IA NO: 3 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with my personal appearance on 14-03-2023 in the above CC.No. 5613 of 2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
2. TENNETI PRABHU DASU
3. V VINOD K REDDY
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE No.5613 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case has been filed complaining the willful disobedience of the respondents in implementing the order dated 03.12.2021 in W.P. No. 28549 of 2021.
2. During the course of hearing today, both the learned counsels would submit that the order of the Court is complied with and hence, further adjudication in this case is not required.
3. In view of the above factual position, this Court is of the view that, no further adjudication is required in the present Contempt Case.
4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date: 05.12.2025 SCS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE No.5613 of 2022
Dt.05.12.2025 SCS