Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/791/2015 of sri k sridhar and other Vs SRI N.SHANKAR REDDY on 3 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 791/2015 Between: 1. SRI K SRIDHAR AND OTHER, S/O. K.S.L. NARASIMHA
APHC010780672015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 791/2015
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SRI K SRIDHAR AND OTHER, S/O. K.S.L. NARASIMHA CHARYULU, HINDU, AGE 54 YEARS, D.NO.42/277, BHAGYA NAGAR COLONY, SHANKARAPURAM, KADAPA - 516002.
2. C. VENKATA SUBBAIAH,, S/O. SUBBARAYUDU, HINDU, AGE 65 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 6/80, BRAHMANA STREET, PORUMAMILLA VILLAGE & MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT(S) AND
1. SRI N SHANKAR REDDY, S/o. N. Subba Reddy, Aged major, Correspondent, Sri Sai Vidyanikethan, Vidya Nagar, Siddavatam Road, Badvel, Kadapa District - 516227.
...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersagainst the Judgment dated 14.09.2015 passed in I.A.No. 1569/2015 in O.S.SR. No. 7706/2015 on the file of Principal District Judge, Kadapa. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CMAMP 1699 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant exparte ad-Interim injunction restraining the respondent/defendant, his men, assignees, agents and persons claiming through him from altering or damaging the structures of the temple including replacing the idol till disposal of the appeal and pass
JS,J C.M.A.No.791/2015
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. P V L BHANU PRAKASH Counsel for the Respondent:
1. SUDARSHAN REDDY DUDDUGUNTA
2. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL
JS,J C.M.A.No.791/2015
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
Though the matter was adjourned on 12.03.2025, 19.03.2025, and 30.04.2025, there was no representation on behalf of learned counsel for the appellants. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 16.10.2025. Even on that day there was no representation for the appellants. Therefore, the matter was listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.
Today when the matter is called, Ms. Sravani, learned counsel appeared through online on behalf of the appellant and requested time.
Since the learned counsel appearing for the appellants is not ready to argue the matter, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as non- prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
Date: 04.12.2025 KAS
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 791/2015
Date: 04.12.2025 KAS