Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/21221/2010 of Sri Ramalingeswara Swamy Temple, Vs The Regional Joint Commissioner, on 3 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 21221/2010 Between: 1. SRI RAMALINGESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE,, MANDADAM VILLAGE,
APHC010338712010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 21221/2010
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SRI RAMALINGESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE,, MANDADAM VILLAGE, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE REGIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMETN, MULTI ZONE-II, TIRUPATHI.
2. THE COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD.
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR.
4. K SAMRAJYAMMA, W/O. LATE VENKAIAH, R/O. MANDADAM VILLAGE, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue aWrit of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, or order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and declare the order of respondent No.1 made in Appeal No. 12 of 2004, dated 3-12-2005 by which recognition was granted to respondent No.4 as a landless poor persons under AC 30/87 and the relevant Rules in G.O.ms.No. 379, dated 4-3-2003 as bad in law, arbitrary and contrary to the weight of evidence and void ab initio and consequently hold that the order made by the 3rd respondent /Assistant Commissioner, Endowments, Guntur in Rc.No. A5/8132/2003, dated 23-6- 2003 valid and correct in law IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 26999 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the order of the 1st respondent/the Regional Joint Commissioner of Endowments Department, Multi Zone-II, Tirupathi made in Apeeal NO. 12 of 2004, dated 3-12-2005 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments,AP Region. Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS AR)
2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following Order:
Heard Sri K.Koteswara Rao, learned satnding counsel for Endowments appearing for the petitioner(s).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the the possession of the land has already been handed over to the CRDA under Land Pooling Scheme. Therefore, the cause in the writ petitions would not survive for adjudication and no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petitions.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Date:04.12.2025 JAK
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 21221 / 2010
04.12.2025 JAK