Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/2856/2025 of R V SESHAGIRI RAO Vs SRI SAI PRASAD IAS on 3 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2856/2025 Between: 1. R V SESHAGIRI RAO, S/O. HANUMANTHA RAO AGE 63 YEARS, R/O. D.

APHC010519882025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2856/2025

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. R V SESHAGIRI RAO, S/O. HANUMANTHA RAO AGE 63 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 4-375/A, NAVULURU, MANAGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. SRI SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. SRI E PREM KUMAR, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DRAINAGE DIVISION REPALLE, BAPATLA DISTRICT.

4. SRI M ANIL KUMAR, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DRAINAGE SUB-DIVISON, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their willful disobedience to the order dated 01.05.2025 passed in W.P. No. 6295 of 2025 in the interest of justice and pass such

JS,J C.C.No.2856/2025

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. CH SRI NAGA MEENA KUMARI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. T S RAYALU The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the order passed by this Court.

Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 04.12.2025 KAS

JS,J C.C.No.2856/2025

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2856/2025

Dated: 04.12.2025 KAS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead