Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/1603/2008 of Tiruvannamalai Lalith Kumar Vs Tiruvannamalai Devanarayana Reddy on 3 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1603/2008 Between: 1. TIRUVANNAMALAI LALITH KUMAR, S/O. DEVANARAYANA
APHC010472262008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1603/2008
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. TIRUVANNAMALAI LALITH KUMAR, S/O. DEVANARAYANA REDDY R/O. D.NO. 440, BANDLA STREET, TIRUPATHI TOWN, CHITTOOR DT.
2. TIRUVANNAMALAI RAVI KUMAR, S/O. DEVANARAYANA REDDY R/O. D.NO. 440, BANDLA STREET, TIRUPATHI TOWN, CHITTOOR DT.
...APPELLANT(S) AND
1. TIRUVANNAMALAI DEVANARAYANA REDDY, S/O. LATE AUDISESHA REDDY R/O. D.NO. 19-9-4, TIRUCHANUR ROAD, TIRUPATHI TOWN CHITTOOR DT.
2. GARAPATI VENKATARAMAKRISHNA RAO, S/O. LATE LAKSHMI NARASIMHA RAO R/O. D.NO. 12-13-241 STREET NO. 15, TARNAKA, SECUNDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2008(CMAMP 2922 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the above appeal Counsel for the Appellant(S):
JS,J C.M.A.No.1603/2008
1. . Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. Y KRISHNA REDDY
2. .
JS,J C.M.A.No.1603/2008
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
On 06.11.2025, it was observed by this Court that though notice sent to the appellants, the same was returned unserved with postal endorsement as ‘addressee left without instructions’. Hence, the matter was directed to post on 27.11.2025. On 27.11.2025, also there was no representation for the appellants, so the matte was adjourned. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested to prosecute the case.
Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 04.12.2025 RSD
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1603/2008
Dated: 04.12.2025 RSD