Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1653/2015 of Palyam Lakshminarasappa @ Guddi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 3 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1653/2015 Between: 1. PALYAM LAKSHMINARASAPPA @ GUDDI, S/O. PALYAM
APHC010577252015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1653/2015
Between:
1. PALYAM
LAKSHMINARASAPPA
@
GUDDI,
S/O.
PALYAM
NARASIMHAPPA, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. CHOLASAMUDARM
VILLAGE, LEPAKSHI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Crl.Rc.Sr; before this Hon'ble Court against the Judgment passed in CrI.A.No.
96 of 2014 on the file of the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Hindupur, Anantapur District dated 13-8-2015 which was confirmed Judgment in S.C.No.
320 of 2013 dated 1-8-2014 on the file of the court of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Hindupur, Anantapur District.
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 2606 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Dispense with the filing of certified copy as well as typed copy 01 Judgment in S.C.No. 320 of 2013 dated 1-8-2014 on the file of the court of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Hindupur Anantapur District for the present and to pass such
other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 2 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 2618 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail by suspending the execution of sentence passed in Judgment passed in CrI.A.No. 96 of 2014 on the file of the Court of Addl.
Sessions Judge, Hindupur, Anantapur District dated 13-8-2015 which was confirmed Judgment in S.C.No. 320 of 2013 dated 1-8-2014 on the file of the court of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Hindupur, Anantapur District, pending disposal of the Crl.P.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N RANGA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following Order:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1653 OF 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The matter was heard on merit on 27.11.2025. Today, the matter is being listed under the caption “For Dismissal”.
2. It appears that against concurrent finding of an order of conviction by the learned Trial Court, the instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred.
3. I have perused the order of sentence and conviction passed by the learned Trial Court as well as learned Appellate Court.
4. On careful observation of the findings, it appears that learned Trial Court has recorded the order of conviction and sentence against the present Petitioner by fixing several points for determination. The order of conviction has also mentioned the evidentiary value of the prosecution witnesses in detail and the documents placed by the prosecution has also been scanned.
5. On careful perusal of the observation of the learned Appellate Court, it appears that the Appellate Court has specifically decided the grounds of Appeal as mentioned by the Petitioner/ Appellant, he has also decided on the point for determination. I find no illegality and impropriety in the order itself.
6. Considering the same, I find no justification to interfere with the order of conviction passed by the learned Trial Court and confirmed by the learned Appellate Court.
7. Under the above observation, the instant Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as devoid of merit. The order of suspension of sentence passed by this Court during pendency of the instant Criminal Revision Case is hereby revoked. The Petitioner is directed to appear before the learned Trial Court within three (03) weeks from the date of passing of this order to serve out the remaining portion of sentence, failing which, learned Trial Court shall issue Non-Bailable Warrant against the present Petitioner to comply the order. Since the Petitioner is not present before this Court, let a copy of this order be served upon the learned Trial Court for ready reference.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date: 04.12.2025 Note: Issue C.C by 08.12.2025 B/o SPP
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1653 of 2015
04.12.2025
Note: Issue C.C by 08.12.2025 B/o SPP