Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/2491/2015 of K.RAVI, CHITTOOR DT., Vs THE STATE OF AP., REP PP., on 3 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2491/2015 Between: 1. K.RAVI, S/O. LATE K.MUNAIAH, R/O. D.NO. 14-513,
APHC010585202015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2491/2015
Between:
1. K.RAVI, S/O. LATE K.MUNAIAH, R/O. D.NO. 14-513, KRISHNA
REDDY NAGAR, AUTO NAGAR, RENIGUNTA ROAD, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP REP PP, rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the state of AP., Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to acquit the revision petitioner/Accused No. 5 by setting aside the judgment dated 19-10-2015 of Special Sessions Judge cum IV Additional Sessions Judge, Tirupathi passed in C.A.No. 267 of
2011.
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 3789 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 16-11-2011 of the learned Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Tirupati passed in SC.No. 347 of 2011.
IA NO: 2 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 3828 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioner on bail by suspending the sentence, conviction and judgment dated 19-10-2015 passed in Crl.A.No.267 of 2011 on the file of the Special Judge, cum IV Additional Sessions Judge, Tirupathi preferred against the Judgment of conviction and sentence dt.16.11.2011 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tirupathi passed inSC.No.347 of2011pending disposal of the above Crl.RC.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PRITHVI SREERAMANENI
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following Order:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2491 OF 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The matter was heard on merit on 21.11.2025. Today, the matter is being listed under the caption “For Dismissal”.
2. It appears that against concurrent finding of an order of conviction by the learned Trial Court, the instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred.
3. I have perused the order of sentence and conviction passed by the learned Trial Court as well as learned Appellate Court.
4. On careful observation of the findings, it appears that learned Trial Court has recorded the order of conviction and sentence against the present Petitioner by fixing several points for determination. The order of conviction has also mentioned the evidentiary value of the prosecution witnesses in detail and the documents placed by the prosecution has also been scanned.
5. On careful perusal of the observation of the learned Appellate Court, it appears that the Appellate Court has specifically decided the grounds of Appeal as mentioned by the Petitioner/ Appellant, he has also decided on the point for determination. I find no illegality and impropriety in the order itself.
6. Considering the same, I find no justification to interfere with the order of conviction passed by the learned Trial Court and confirmed by the learned Appellate Court.
7. Under the above observation, the instant Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as devoid of merit. The order of suspension of sentence passed by this Court during pendency of the instant Criminal Revision Case is hereby revoked. The Petitioner is directed to appear before the learned Trial Court within three (03) weeks from the date of passing of this order to serve out the remaining portion of sentence, failing which, learned Trial Court shall issue Non-Bailable Warrant against the present Petitioner to comply the order. Since the Petitioner is not present before this Court, let a copy of this order be served upon the learned Trial Court for ready reference.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date: 04.12.2025 Note: Issue C.C by 08.12.2025 B/o SPP
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2491 of 2015
04.12.2025
Note: Issue C.C by 08.12.2025 B/o SPP