Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/33555/2025 of M. Manjula Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 1 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 33555 Between: M Manjula The State Of AP Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent: The Court
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
APHC010649062025
IN THE H ( TUESDAY, T TWO TH THE HONOURABLE WRIT P Between: M Manjula The State Of AP Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Responde The Court made the follow
The present writ p respondents in not releas Encashment of Earned Le Arrears and DA Arrears an she was retired from service
2. Heard Smt. Kavitha learned Assistant Govern respondents. With the cons disposed of at the stage of a
3. The petitioner has joi Teacher. She was further service on 31.01.2024. Bu HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER HOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT E SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDA PETITION NO: 33555 OF 2025 ...PE AND ...RES r:
Kavitha Gottipati ent: GP for Services I wing order: petition is filed challenging the acti sing the retiremental benefits i.e., th eave and Half Pay leave, Surrender L nd other terminal benefits to the petitio e on 31.01.2024. Gottipati, learned counsel for the pet ment Pleader for Services-I appeari sent of both the learned counsel, the wr admission. ined in service on 25.09.1989 as Secon promoted as School Assistant and r ut her retirement benefits are not being
AVA ETITIONER SPONDENT ion of the e Gratuity, eave, PRC oner though titioner and ng for the it petition is dary Grade retired from g paid. It is contended that there is no dispute with regard to the entitlement of the petitioner for the amounts and it has already been determined as payable to the petitioner and the respondents have processed the bills.
4. The required bills, as per the procedure have also been uploaded in the CFMS portal and it remained at that stage and the amount has not been credited to the account of the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the decision of Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.28306 of 2025 dated 17.10.2025.
6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the respondents would not dispute the same.
7. Having regard the submissions made, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction to the respondents to process and remit/pay the retirement benefits to the credit of account of the Petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
8. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Date: 02.12.2025 BSK
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 33555 OF 2025
Date: 02.12.2025 BSK