Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/22794/2011 of KILANA APPARAO,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT & 20 OTHERS Vs SRI VISAKHA GRAMEENA BNAK, KORADA BRANCH & 2 OTHERS on 1 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22794/2011 Between: 1. KILANA APPARAO,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT & 20 OTHERS, S/O.LATE

APHC010711972011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 22794/2011

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. KILANA APPARAO,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT &

OTHERS, S/O.LATE NARAYANA CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

2. PATHIVADA GOVINDA RAO, S/O.LATE PRAKASARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

3. SMT.PATHIVADA NARAYANAMMA, W/O.GOVINDARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

4. BALAGA VENKATARAMANA, S/O.LATE DALAPPANNA CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

5. KILLANA SRINIVASARAO, S/O.LATE LACHUMAYYA CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

6. KILLANA SUBHAKIRTHI, S/O.LATE LACHUMAYYA CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

7. SMT.BANTUPALLI CHINNAMMA, W/O.LATE ENDU CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

APPALANAIDU, S/O.LATE PRAKASARAO

JS,J W.P.No.22794/2011

CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

9. SMT.PATHIVADA INDIRA, W/O.APPALA NAIDU CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

10. PATHIVADA SATEESH, S/O.APPALA NAIDU CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

11. CHIMMARI VENKATA RAMANA, S/O.LATE MOHANARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

12. CHIMMARI GOVINDARAO, S/O.LATE SUBBAIAH CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

13. BARRI GOVINDARAO, S/O.NARAYANARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

14. BARRI NARAYANA RAO, S/O.LATE APPALA NARASIMHULU CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

15. BARRI RAJYALAKSHMI, D/O.NARAYANARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

16. SMT.BARRI VAZRALAMMA, W/O.NARAYANARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

17. SOMIREDDY DEENABANDHU NAIDU, S/O.LATE DHARMARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

18. PONDURU APPARAO, S/O.GURAYYA CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

19. GULU VINDALA GANESH, S/O.LATE NAGABHUSHAN

JS,J W.P.No.22794/2011

CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

20. SMT.GULUVINDALA DRAKASHAYAMI, W/O.LATE NAGABHUSHAN CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

21. PADALA LAXMI NARAYANA, S/O.PADALA APPALA SWAMI CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. SRI VISAKHA GRAMEENA BNAK KORADA BRANCH 2 OTHERS, KORADA BRANCH,REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

2. THE GOVT OF INDIA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI

3. THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA REP BY ITS GOVERNOR, MUMBAI

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandmaus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in deducting the amounts from the agricultural loan accounts of the petitioner which was remitted by way of cheques by the Land Acquisition officer, is illegal, arbitrary,and against the principles of natural justice consequently directing the 1st respondent to remit back the deducted amounts along with the interest from the date of deduction of amounts to the date of actual relaization and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 27863 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to remit back the principal amounts including deducted amounts which were deducted from the accounts of the petitioners pending disposal of main writ petition and pass

JS,J W.P.No.22794/2011

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. RAJA GOPALA RAO HANUMANTHU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

2. V UMA DEVI The Court made the following ORDER:

Though the matter was adjourned on 09.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 25.11.2025. Even on that day there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption <for dismissal=.

Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioners. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioners is not interested to prosecute the case.

Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 02.12.2025 KAS

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 22794/2011

Dated: 02.12.2025 KAS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead