Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/1080/2012 of SEELAM NARASIMHA REDDY Vs THE STATE OF AP., REP BY PP & ANOTHER on 1 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1080/2012 Between: 1. SEELAM NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O RAMI REDDY HINDU, R/O

APHC010543922012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1080/2012

Between:

1. SEELAM NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O RAMI REDDY HINDU, R/O

VIDYA NAGAR, GUNTUR

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP REP BY PP ANOTHER, REP BY ITS PUBLIC

PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF AP., HYDERABAD

2. PATIBANDLA HEMALATHA, W/O M.RAGHAVA RAO HINDU, R/O

D.NO.10-2-15, CHENCHUPET, TENALI,GUNTUR DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased to present this Crl.RC

before this Honble Court against the Judgment passed in Crl.A.No.387/2011

on the file of the Court of the II Addl.Sessions Judge, Guntur District dt 13.4.2012 to the extent aggrieved in modifying the Judgment passed in CC

No.225/2008 on the file of the Court of the Spl.JFCM., for Prohibition and Excise Guntur dt 1-10.2011

IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CRLRCMP 1600 OF 2012

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 1 days in representing of SR No.1833 of 2012 and pass

SS,J

Crl.R.C.No.1080 of 2012

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M RAVINDRA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. DEVI PRASAD MANGALAPURI

2. -

3. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

The Court made the following:

SS,J

Crl.R.C.No.1080 of 2012

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Ms. S. Maha Swetha Varma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M. Ravindra, learned advocate for the petitioner submits on instructions that the petitioner not intending to proceed further in the instant Criminal Revision Case. Taking note of the submissions of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the instant Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this petition, shall stand closed.

____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date: 02.12.2025 JLSR/PBS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead