Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/44545/2018 of Tati Raja (ST) Vs The Union of India on 30 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 44545/2018 Between: 1. TATI RAJA (ST), S/O. SRIRAMMURTY, AGED 22 YEARS, R/O.
APHC010920272018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 44545/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. TATI RAJA (ST), S/O. SRIRAMMURTY, AGED 22 YEARS, R/O. PALACHERLARAJAVARAM VILLAGE, JEELUGILLI MANDAL,W.G.DISTRICT
2. SOYAM RAMESHWARRAO(ST), S/O. KANNA RAO, AGED 24 YEARS,
R/O. SIRRIVARIGUDEM,
H/O. JEELULGUMILLI GRAMPANCHAYAT, JEELUGUMILLI MANDAL, W.G.DT.
3. N.RAMAKRISHNA (ST), S/O. EADAIAH, AGED 24 YEARS, R/O SIRRIVARIGUDEM, H/O JEELUGUMILLI GRAMPANCHAYAT, JEELUGUMILLI MANDAL, W.G.DT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM, NEW DELHI.
2. THE HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE, H.P.PETRO PARK, PORT CONNECTIVITY ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. SMT PIDA DURGA, W/O. JAGDEESH(SC, MALA DASARI BY CASTE), AGED 30 YEARS, R/O. ANKANNAGUDEM GRAMPANCHAYAT, JEELUGUMILLI MANDAL,W.G.DT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
JS,J W.P.No.44545/2018
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declare the proceedings of the1st Respondent in Proceedings A/G/SZ/AP/06/7269(G46502), Dated. 05.09.2017 as illegal arbitrary and consequentially direct the 2nd respondent corporation to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner on 17.04.2008 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the proceedings of the 1st respondent in proceedings A/G/SZ/AP/06/7269(G46502), Dated. 05.09.2017 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P R K AMERANDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. T SUJAN KUMAR
2. PENUMAKA VENKATA RAO
JS,J W.P.No.44545/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri T. Balaji, learned counsel representing Sri P.R.K. Amarendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 01.12.2025
KAS
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 44545/2018
Dated: 01.12.2025 KAS