Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/638/2018 of Yakkala .Mohan Rao Vs Union of India on 30 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 638/2018 Between: 1. YAKKALA .MOHAN RAO, S/O YAKKALA SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 55
APHC010007072018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 638/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. YAKKALA .MOHAN RAO, S/O YAKKALA SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCCUPATION-BUSINESS, RESIDING AT DOOR NUMBER 11-94, JANAPADU ROAD, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT S/O YAKKALA SURYANARAYANA OCC.BUSINESS, RESIDING AT D.NO .11-94 JANAPADU ROAD PIDUGURALALLA TOWN GUNTUR
...PETITIONER AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHIREP BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, GOVT OF INDIA NEW DELHI
2. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY, REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR, MINISTRY OF SHIPPING, ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, GOVT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI
3. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND REVENUE, DIVISIONAL OFFICER VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toMAY be pleased issue a writ order or direction , more so a writin nature of mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in interfering
JS, J W.P.No.638/2018
with the possession of the petitioner on his property admeasuring 58.2 cents or 2817.5 sq yards in D.no 693 at pedakakani village , guntur dist with out following due process of law either to acquire or take possession of the petitioners property as arbitrary , illegal, highhanded and contrary to the orders of this honble court in writ petition no .30161 of 2011 consequentilly direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner on his property and to pass such orers IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased prayed that this hon'ble court may be to pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's property admeasuring 58.2 cents in D.no 693 pedakakani village, guntur dist pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such orders Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. S S VARMA (SC FOR NHAI)
JS, J W.P.No.638/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
No representation for the petitioner.
Sri.S.S.Varma, learned Standing Counsel for respondents submits that the entire compensation amount for the land acquired is deposited into the petitioner’s bank account and no further orders are required.
Recording the submission of learned Standing Counsel for respondents, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 01.12.2025 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 638/2018
Date: 01.12.2025 rsd