Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/1001/2011 of MR. P. RAMU, VIS. Vs SRI VARAHA LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SWAMY, VIS. on 27 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1001/2011 Between: 1. MR. P. RAMU, VIS., S/O. GANGA RAJU,
APHC010324612011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1001/2011
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MR. P. RAMU, VIS., S/O. GANGA RAJU, LABOURER R/O. PLOT NO. 18, DURGANAGAR, H.B COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 022
...APPELLANT AND
1. SRI VARAHA LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SWAMY VIS, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam, Rep by its Executive Officer and Regional Joint Commissioner
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent:
1. E SAMBASIVA PRATAP
JS,J C.M.A.No.1001/2011
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
As there was no representation for the appellant on 11.07.2025 and 01.08.2025, the matter was adjourned to 29.08.2025. On 29.08.2025 there was no representation for the appellant. Hence the matter was directed to be listed on 23.10.2025. On 23.10.2025 also there was no representation for the appellant. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”
Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the case.
Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 28.11.2025 RSD
JS,J C.M.A.No.1001/2011
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1001/2011
Dated: 28.11.2025 RSD