Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/33111/2025 of ALLUMALLA JAGADEESH Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 27 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. ALLUMALLA JAGADEESH, S/O. PADAMATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, PC 3956 P.M.PALEM LAW AND
APHC010628832025
IN THE H
(
FRIDAY, THE T
TWO TH
THE HONOURABLE
WRIT P
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. ALLUMALLA JAGADE YEARS, PC 3956 P.M DIVISION VISAKHAPA
1. THE STATE OF AN SECRETARY,
VELAGAPUDI, AMAR
2. THE STATE OF AN SECRETARY HOME AMARAVATI, GUNTU
3. THE DIRECTOR G ANDHRA PRADESH,
4. THE COMMISSIO VISAKHAPATNAMDIS
Petition under Article circumstances stated in th pleased to issue a writ, orde Writ of mandamus, the inac protection and pay fixatio accordance with the G.O M HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER HOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT E SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDA PETITION NO: 33111 OF 2025 EESH, S/O. PADAMATA RAO, AGED A M.PALEM LAW AND ORDER P.S., NOR ATNAM. ...PE AND NDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS P FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECR RAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. NDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS P DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELA UR DISTRICT GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNM MANAGALAGIRI. ONER OF POLICE, VISAKHA STRICT. ...RESPON 226 of the Constitution of India praying e affidavit filed therewith, the High Co er or direction more particularly one in th ction of the 1st to 4th respondents not g on as per the 7th Revised pay com MS NO. 95 dated 03.04.2012, or to san
R AVA ABOUT 45 RTH SUB- TITIONER PRINCIPAL RETARIAT, PRINCIPAL AGAPUDI, MENT OF APATNAM NDENT(S): g that in the urt may be he nature of ranting pay mmission in nction with
advance increments as per the revised 11 PRC , as being illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 16, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and based on total non-application of mind and further contrary to the provisions contained in G.O.Ms. No.95 dt.3.4.2012 and consequently direct the 1st to 4th Respondents to reconsider the representation of the Petitioner, and grant Pay Protection as per the Last Pay drawn on Revised Pay Commission or with advance increments of served years in accordance with the G.O.Ms.No.95, dt,03.04.2012, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 1 to 4 to provide the Pay Protection and pay fixation to the Petitioner as per the Last Pay Drawn in accordance with the Revised 7th Pay Commission in accordance with the G.O.Ms.No.95, dt.03.04.2012,or sanction advance increments of served years as per the revised 11th PRC pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VELURY RAGHURAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 33111 OF 2025 The Court made the following order:
Heard Sri Velury Raghuram, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for respondents.
2. The writ petitioner challenges the inaction on the part of the respondents in granting a Pay protection and Pay fixation as per the Last Pay Drawn of 7th Revised pay commission in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.95, dated 03.04.2012, the instant writ petition is filed.
3. The petitioner contends that he was retired from the Indian Army on 30.09.2015 and subsequently he was selected and appointed as a Police Constable under Ex-servicemen quota in 2018, by the 4th respondent. In the said post, his pay was fixed at Rs. 16,400/- in the scale of Rs.16,400/- - Rs.49,870/-. He seeks pay protection and pay fixation in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.95, dated 03.04.2012.
4. It is argued that the issue raised in the Writ Petition is covered by a judgment of the coordinate bench in W.P.Nos.28527, 28133 & 28164 of 2025. The said writ petitions were disposed of with the following directions:
“The Respondents are directed to examine the claim of the Petitioner for Pay protection and Pay Fixation in terms of G.O.Ms.No.95, dated 03.04.2012 within a period of eight weeks from today.”
5. Having regard to the submissions made, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to examine the claim of the Petitioner for Pay protection and Pay Fixation in terms of G.O.Ms.No.95, dated 03.04.2012 within a period of eight weeks from today.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 28.11.2025 BSK
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 33111 OF 2025
Date: 28.11.2025 BSK