Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/606/2022 of Rayudu Rajkumar Vs SRI GOPALAKRISHNA TRIVEDI on 27 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 606/2022 Between: 1. RAYUDU RAJKUMAR, S/O. LATE SATHYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED
APHC010094752022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 606/2022
Between:
1. RAYUDU RAJKUMAR, S/O. LATE SATHYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
V.L.W.
CONTRACTOR,
KATERU,
RAJAHMUNDRY RURAL MANDAL, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI
GOPALAKRISHNA
TRIVEDI,
THE
STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. SRI KONA SASIDHAR, THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ
AND
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT,
GOVERNMENT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH, N.H.16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
3. SRI C HARI KIRAN IAS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA, A.P.
4. SRI
A
B
V
VARAPRASAD,
THE
EXECUTIVE
ENGINEER,
PANCHAYAT RAJ DIVISION, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents / contemnors for wilfully disobeying the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 24968/2021 dated 29-10- 2021 under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and in accordance with Article 215 of the Constitution of India and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SUBRAHMANYAM
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE No.606 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents complaining wilful disobedience of the order, dated 29.10.2021 in W.P.No.24968 of 2021.
2. During the course of hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that the order of this Court is complied with and the payments are made to the petitioner as directed by this Court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also endorsed the same.
4. In view of the above factual position, in our considered view, no further adjudication is required in the Contempt Case.
5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed.
_____________________________
JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 28.11.2025 PGR
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE No.606 of 2022
Date: 28.11.2025 PGR