Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/33091/2025 of ELMA RANI BONIGALA Vs THE CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD on 26 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33091/2023 Between: 1. AKULA MADHAVI, W/O. ANJANEYULU, AGED 51 YEARS,
APHC010643342023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 33091/2023
Between:
1. AKULA MADHAVI, W/O. ANJANEYULU, AGED 51 YEARS, R/O. D.
NO. 6-310/1, 0PP. TO AMULYA APARTMENTS, REVENUE COLONY
@ SRINIVASA COLONY, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
2. AKULA ANJANEYULU,, S/O. RAMANAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. D.
NO. 6-310/1, 0PP. TO AMULYA APARTMENTS, REVENUE COLONY
@ SRINIVASA COLONY, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
3. AKULA SRINIVASA RAO @ SRINIVASULU,, S/O. ANJANEYULU, AGED 29 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 6-310/1, 0PP. TO AMULYA
APARTMENTS, REVENUE COLONY @ SRINIVASA COLONY, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
TO
GOVERNMENT,
HOME
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT
ONGOLE.
3. AKULA BEZAWADA MADHURYA LAKSHMI, W/O. KALYAN KUMAR, AGED 26 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 48-1-37, CHIVUKULAVARI VEEDHI, MARATIPALEM, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KAREEMULLA SHAIK
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 2nd respondent at the instance of respondent in repeatedly insisting petitioners to appear before her authority and threatening to implicate them in false criminal cases and arrest them, if petitioners do not yield to the terms of the 3rd respondent concerning matrimonial issues in spite of 498-A of IPC is pending before the Learned III Addl. Judicial first Class Magistrate, Ongole vide C.C. No. 1447 of 2022, as illegal, irregular, irrational. without there being any authority or sanction of law and violative of articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere in any manner with petitioners personal life and liberty”
2. Heard Sri Shaik Kareemulla, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that based on a compliant made by respondent No.3, a case in Crime No.12 of 2022 has been registered against the petitioners and others. Except that, the police never insisted the petitioners to appear before them.
4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime which is registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:10.12.2025 Asr
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.33091 of 2023
Dt.10.12.2025
Asr