Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/19/2023 of M.JOHN SAMPATH KUMAR Vs MAMILLA VIJAYA KUMARI on 24 November 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3562] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO:
APHC010646372022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 19/2023
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M.JOHN SAMPATH KUMAR, S/O. M. GEORGE MICHAEL, AGE. 61 YEARS, OCC. RETD SCHOOL HEAD MASTER, R/O. 26-505, VIJAYAPURI COLONY, RS ROAD, VTC. MOOLASAGGRAM RURAL, NANDYALA POST, KURNOOL DIST-518502
...APPELLANT AND
1. MAMILLA VIJAYA KUMARI, W/o. John Sampath Kumar, D/o. K. Prasada Rao, Age. 59 years, House wife, R/o. H. No. 26-505/1, Vijaypuri colony, R.S. Road, VTC. Moolasaggram Rural, Nandyala post, Kurnool Dist.-518502
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1. VARUN BYREDDY Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
Guardian O.P.No.04/2022 in the Court of the III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kurnool at Nandyal, filed by the present appellant was dismissed. The same was filed seeking permission to alienate the petition schedule property of the minor.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that during pendency of the appeal, the minor has attained the majority and consequently, the present appeal has been rendered infructuous.
3. Recording the same, the C.M.A is dismissed as infructuous.
4. Let the record of the Trial Court, if received, be sent to the Court concerned. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J Date: 25.11.2025 Pab
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 19/2023 DATE: 25.11.2025
Pab