Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/400/2020 of G MOKSHITH REDDY Vs M NAGABUSHASNAMMA on 23 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 400 OF 2020 Between: 1. G MOKSHITH REDDY, S/O. G MADHUSUDHAN
APHC010056732020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 400 OF 2020
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. G MOKSHITH REDDY, S/O. G MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, MINOR
2. G DHATHRIKAVALLI,, D/O. G MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS, MINOR REP BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT G THUTSAI G MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. AMMAPALEM VILLAGE AND POST, SRIKALAHSTI MANDAL CHITTOOR DIST.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. M NAGABUSHASNAMMA, W/O. SUBRAMANYAM NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT
YEARS, R/O. CHERTOPALLI VILLAGE, SRIKALAHASTI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST.
2. G MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, S/O. GURAVA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. AMMAPALEM VILLAGE AND POST, SRIKALAHSTI MANDAL CHITTOOR DIST.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. T JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ADINARAYANA VALLU
2. S A RAZAK The Court made the following Order :
The Judgment Debtor has preferred the instant Civil Revision Petition against the Execution Proceedings pending before the learned Civil Judge concerned.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the matter was settled amicably between the Judgment Debtor and Decree Holder. Consequently, one memo regarding full satisfaction of the said Execution Petition has been placed on record duly signed by both Decree Holder and Judgment Debtor, attested by learned counsel for the parties on record.
3. Considering the matter, he prayed for withdrawal of the instant Civil Revision Petition.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners and considering the Memo as placed on record, it appears that the matter was settled out of Court. Thus, the instant Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
Date: 24.11.2025
KK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 400 OF 2020
Date: 24.11.2025
KK