Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/27847/2025 of BIKKEM ARUNA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 23 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 27847/2025 Between: 1. BIKKEM ARUNA, W/O BIKKEM ANJI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC
APHC010538952025
IN TH
MONDAY, THE
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
THE HONOURAB
WR
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. BIKKEM ARUNA, W HOME MAKER R MANDAL PALNAD 64/1, SHANTHAVA KONDAMALLEPAL TELANGANA- 5082
1. THE STATE OF A ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, VELGAPU
2. THE COLLECTOR DISTRICT.
3. THE SUPERINTEN
4. THE SUPERINTE RAJAMAHENDRAV Petition under Articl circumstances stated in pleased topleased to Respondents herein to E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) E TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEM THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G RIT PETITION NO: 27847/2025 W/O BIKKEM ANJI AGED ABOUT 33 R/O 1-69, GOTTIPALLA VILLAGE, DU DISTRICT. PRESENTLY RESIDIN AHA NAGAR CENTRAL BANK LY MANDAL
NALAGONDA
243. AND P, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETAR (SC-1) DEPARTMENT A.P. S UDI GUNTUR DISTRICT. R AND DISTRICT MAGISTRAT DENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTR ENDENT OF POLICE, CENTR VARAM. ...RES le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus produce my husband/Detenu i.e., B DESH
MBER DRANATH ROY GEDELA 3 YEARS, OCC VELDURTHY NG AT D.NO 5- BACK SIDE, A DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER RY GENERAL SECRETARIAT E, PALNADU RICT. RAL PRISON, SPONDENT(S): aying that in the h Court may be directing the Bikkem Anji S/o
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.27847 of 2025
Veeraiah, Aged about 36 years, Occ Agriculturalist R/o Gottipalla Village, Veldurthy Mandal, Palnadu District, Presently residing at D.No 5-64/1, Shanthavaha Nagar, Central Bank Back Side, Kondamallepally Mandal Nalagonda District, Telangana- 508243 before this Hon'ble Court and may be set at liberty/ordered to be released forthwith by declaring the order of Detention passed by the 2nd Respondent Vide proceedings RC. No. 51/2025-C1, dated 10.09.2025 as illegal arbitrary and colorable excise of powers and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner and the relatives to meet the detenu i.e. Bikkem Anji S/o Veeraiah Aged about 36 years, Occ: Agriculturalist R/o Gottipalla Village Veldurthy Mandal, Palnadu District Presently residing at D.No 5- 64/1, Shanthavaha Nagar, Central Bank Back Side Kondamallepally Mandal, Nalagonda District, Telangana- 508243 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMALAKSHMANA REDDY SANEPALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.27847 of 2025
The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
Challenging the order of preventive detention dated 10.09.2025 passed against the detenu, the instant writ petition has been filed by the wife of the detenu.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleader attached to the office of learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submits that based on the orders of the advisory board, the detenu was already released and the Government, by way of G.O.Rt.No.1920 GAD (SC-I) Department, dated 17.10.2025, passed an order of revocation of the preventive detention. He has also placed on record the said G.O.Rt.No.1920, dated 17.10.2025.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also, on instructions, submits that the detenu was released and revocation order was passed as per the aforesaid G.O.
4. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication.
5. Therefore, recording the aforesaid submissions made by both learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 24.11.2025 MDP