Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/41553/2015 of Nallagatla Saritha, Vs National Highways Authority of India, on 23 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 3459 PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.41553 OF 2015 Between: Nallagatla Saritha and 2 others --- Petitioners and
APHC010370762015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.41553 OF 2015
Between:
Nallagatla Saritha and 2 others
---
Petitioners
and
National Highways Authority of
India, Rep. by its Chairman,
G5 & 6, Sector-10, Dwaraka,
New Delhi-110075 and 3 others
---
Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioners
: Sri G.V.L. Murthy
Counsel for the Respondents : G.P. for Revenue
S.S. Varma (SC for NHAI)
The Court made the following:
JS,J
WP No.41553/2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioners seeking the following relief:
“…..to issue any writ, order or direction more in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the action of the 3rd respondent in making markings in the petitioner’s lands being Ac.1.00 in Sy.No. 54-2-1-B-2, Ac.1.00 in Sy.No.54-2-1-A and Ac.1.00 in Sy.No.54-2-1-B-1, respectively in Uppalapadu Village, Veldurthi Mandal, Guntur District, without notifying the required extent of land from the petitioners’ lands and further action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners from their respective extents of land as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 15 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from their respective lands mentioned above and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper …”
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, fairly submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
JS,J WP No.41553/2015
3. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:24.11.2025 DSH