Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/32604/2025 of M/s.Chandana Brothers Multi Complex Pvt Ltd Vs THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION on 21 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32604/2025 Between: 1. M/S.CHANDANA BROTHERS MULTI COMPLEX PVT LTD, REP. BY
APHC010630312025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 32604/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M/S.CHANDANA BROTHERS MULTI COMPLEX PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS LIAISON OFFICER AND AUTHORISED EXECUTIVE V.SANKARA RAO, S/O.SATYNARAYANA GUPTA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, D.NO.51-1-35, NEW RESAPUVANIPALEM
MADDILAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM-530013.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR DOOR NO. 45-57-21/1, RR HOUSE AKKAYYAPALEM HIGHWAY ROAD NARASIMHA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 024 ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE RECOVERY OFFICER, EMPLOYEES' STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION DOOR NO. 45-57-21/1, RR HOUSE NARASIMHA NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM HIGHWAY ROAD VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 024 ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. M/S BUILDING CONTROL SOLUTIONS I PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR D.NO.37-95, 13TH MAIN HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560038.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in
JS,J W.P.No.32604/2025
the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the notice vide No.70Q/ 70500233170011001 dt.10.11.2025 without considering the petitioner's reply dt.29.10.2025 submitted pursuant to the order under Section 45G of the ESI ACT, 1948 vide No.70Q/ 70500233170011001 dt.09.10.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, ultra vires to the power under ESI Act, violative of principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Articles 14,19(1 )(g) of the Constitution and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to notice under Section 45G(x) vide No.70Q/70500233170011001 dt.10.11.2025 issued by the 2nd Respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M/S INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. JS,J W.P.No.32604/2025
The Court made the following ORDER:
Heard both the learned counsel.
Both the parties agreed to dispose the writ petition at admission stage.
The Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the explanation of the petitioner dated 29.10.2025 and pass appropriate orders after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, no coercive action shall be taken in pursuance of the impugned notice dated 10.11.2025. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 22.11.2025
RSD
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 32604/2025
Dated: 22.11.2025
RSD