Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/15416/2017 of Smt. Pedasanaganti Punyavathamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary on 20 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15416/2017 Between: 1. SMT. PEDASANAGANTI PUNYAVATHAMMA, W/O. LATE

APHC010374762017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 15416/2017

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SMT. PEDASANAGANTI PUNYAVATHAMMA, W/O. LATE PEDASANAGANTI HANUMANTHARAMA SARMA, AGED 66 YEARS, OCC : HOUSEWIFE,

2. PEDASANAGANTI BALANAGA BUSHANA CHARYALU,, W/O. LATE PEDASANAGANTI HANUMANTHARAMA SARMA, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC : CARPENTER,

3. PEDASANAGANTI RAMASESHA CHARYALU,, W/O. LATE PEDASANAGANTI HANUMANTHARAMA SARMA, AGED 36EARS, OCC : CARPENTER, ALL ARE R/O. H.NO.2-134, CHALIVENDRAPALERN VILLAGE, KANKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS & BUILDING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH

2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, PIU, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH

3. THE REGIONAL OFFICER, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, RO, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH

...RESPONDENT(S):

JS, J W.P.No.15416/2017

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents without any notice from the Respondents are laying National Highway road from Vijayawada to Machilipatnam of 0/000 to 64/611 in the state of Andhra Pradesh under NHDP Phase IIIA by demolishing the 2(two) House in the Petitioners property admeasuring 28 Cents in Sy.No.32 & 33, situated at Chalivendrapalem Village, Kankipadu. Mandal, Krishna District without payment of compensation to the Petitioners sustain irreparable loss by violating under Sec.24(2) of Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as is illegal arbitrary, contrary to law of land and in violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 19030 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to 4 to stay of the Respondents are laying National Highway road from Vijayawada to Machilipatnam of 0/000 to 64/611 in the state of Andhra Pradesh under NHDP Phase II1A for 28 Cents, in the property of the Petitioners land Sy.No.32 & 33, situated at Chalivendrapalem Kankipadu Mandal, Krishna District pending representation dated 10.12.2016 before the Respondents authorities pending disposal of the main writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2017(WPMP 95067 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. K BUCHI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. S S VARMA (SC FOR NHAI)

2. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP)

3. JS, J W.P.No.15416/2017

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the compensation has already been paid to the petitioners and no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition.

Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 21.11.2025 SCH

JS, J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 15416/2017

Date: 21.11.2025 SCH

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead