Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/15889/2014 of Venkateswara Teachers Training Institute Vs The National Council for Teacher Education on 20 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15889/2014 Between: 1. VENKATESWARA TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE, KARVETINAGAR,
APHC010593732014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 15889/2014
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VENKATESWARA TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE, KARVETINAGAR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP. BY K. DAMODARAM, CORRESPONDENT SRI VENKATESWARA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY KARVETINAGAR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION, HANS BHAWAN WING-II, I, BAHADURSHAH ZAFER MARG NEW DELHI- 110002, REP. BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY
2. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION JNANA BHARATI CAMPUS ROAD, NAGARABHAVI, OPP. NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL, BANGALORE-560072
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order F. No. 89-489/2013 Appeal/17th Meeting-2013 dt. 10.1.2014 from the file of the 1st Respondent and after perusing the same, quash the impugned order dt. 10.1.2014 and as well as the rejection order F. No. SRCAPP 1401/D.ELEd./AP/2013-14/ 51714 dt. 17.5.2013 of the 2'd Respondent and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to accord permission to the petitioner
JS,J W.P.No.15889/2014
forthwith for starting D.Ei.Ed. course, taking into consideration the written representation dt.12.11.2012 submitted by the petitiOner to the show cause notice dt.1.11.2012 of the 2nd Respondent and with all other consequential benefits and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 19693 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim directions directing the 2" Respondent to consider granting permission to the petitioner to start D.Ei.Ed. course for the academic year 2014-2015, in the light of the written representation dt.12.11.2012 of the petitioner, by suspending the impugned order F. No. 89-489/2013 Appeal/17th Meeting-2013 dt. 10.1.2014 of the 1st Respondent pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K RAMAKANTH REDDY
2. VENNA HEMANTH KUMAR(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL)
JS,J W.P.No.15889/2014
The Court made the following ORDER:
No representation for the petitioner.
On the earlier occasion also i.e., on 12.11.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.
Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 21.11.2025 SCH
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 15889/2014
Dated: 21.11.2025 SCH