WP/36423/2016 of Visakhapatnam Cargo Handling Private Workers Pool Vs The Union of India, represented by its Secretary, on 20 November 2025

1. VISAKHAPATNAM CARGO HANDLING PRIVATE WORKERS POOL, KARMICA SANKSHEMA SANGAM REGD.NO.150/2007 DOOR NO.32- 6-2, JANDA CHETTU STREET, VISAKHAPATNAM REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT V.SATHI RAJU S/O NALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT: 45 YRS.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF SURFACE TRANSPORT, SANSHAD MARG, NEW DELHI.

2. THE VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN,

3. THE TRAFFIC MANAGER, CARGO HANDLING DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST, ERSTWHILE V.D.L.B., VISAKHAPATNAM.

4. CARGO HANDLING PRIVATE WORKERS POOL, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT K.V. KRISHNA KUMAR RESIDENT OF OPP. TO FIRE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in

JS,J W.P.No.36423/2016

trying to merge the Trust for Cargo Handling Private Workers Pool in any similar objective Trust until finalized the conciliation proceedings is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently to prohibit the 4th respondent to merge the Trust for Cargo Handling Private Workers Pool into any similar objective Trust until finalized the conciliation proceedings, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 44873 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to stop the financial transactions of the Trust until finalize with the issues of Cargo Handling Pool Private Limited, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2016(WPMP 196555 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SESHU KUMAR NALI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. NAMAVARAPU R RAO(CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL)

2. SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI

3. V UMA DEVI

4. VIRUPAKSHA DATTATREYA GOUDA (SC FOR VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY)

JS,J W.P.No.36423/2016

The Court made the following ORDER:

No representation for the petitioner.

On the earlier occasions also i.e., on 28.10.2025 and 11.11.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.

Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 21.11.2025 SCH

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 36423/2016

Dated: 21.11.2025 SCH