Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/31754/2025 of Sri Harsha Innovative Educational Society, Vs The Union of India, on 18 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 31754/2025 Between: 1. SRI HARSHA INNOVATIVE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, REP.BY ITS

APHC010613572025

IN TH

WEDNESDAY

TWO

THE HONOURABLE SR

THE HONOURAB

WR

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SRI HARSHA INNO CORRESPONDENT 56-10-40, PLOT N VIJAYAWADA - 520

2. YALAMANCHILI SW 73 YEARS, OCC B 10, P AND T COLO

3. NUKAVARAPU HA AGED 53 YEARS, O NO-10, P AND T C

4. NUKAVARAPU MA 46 YEARS, OCC S 10 -40, PLOT N VIJAYAWADA - 520

5. KATURI ABHISHEK OCC BUSINESS, VIJAYAWADA- 521

1. THE UNION OF IN OF FINANCIAL SE E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) , THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEM THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G RIT PETITION NO: 31754/2025 OVATIVE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY T N. MADHAVI, AGED 46 YEARS, R NO-10, P AND T COLONY-3, 0008. WARAJYALAKSHMI,, W/O. VENKAT BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.-56-10-4 ONY-3, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA - 5 ANUMAIAH CHOWDARY,, S/O. NAG OCC BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.-56 OLONY-3, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWAD ADHAVI,, W/O. HANUMAIAH CHOW SCHOOL CORRESPONDENT, R/O. NO-10, P AND T COLONY-3, 0008. K RAJU,, S/O. BHASKAR RAO, AGE

R/O. DOOR NO.4-132/B

S

212. ...P AND NDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, D ERVICES, MINISTRY OF FINANCE DESH

MBER DRANATH ROY GEDELA Y,, REP.BY ITS R/O. DOOR NO- PATAMATA, ARAO, AGED 40, PLOT NO- 520008. GESWARRAO, 6-10-40, PLOT DA-520008. DARY, AGED DOOR NO-56- PATAMATA, ED 29 YEARS, SURAMPALLE, PETITIONER(S) DEPARTMENT E UNION OF

INDIA, JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, SANAD MARG, NEW DELHI - 110001.

2. THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, CHITRALAYA ROAD NEAR LEELAMAHAL ROAD DABA GARDENS, JAGADAMBA JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 020.

3. THE KANAKAMAHALAKSHMI COOPERATIVE BANK LTD, REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, GURUNANAK COLONY, VIJAYAWADA

- 520008. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 2nd Respondent in not deciding Petitioners Stay Application in I.A. No. 4246 of 2025, dated 06.11.2025 filed under Section 17 of the Secularization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 in SA. No. 667 of 2025 and further action of 3rd Respondent in deciding to take possession of petitioners secured property of an RCC residential building (G plus 2) bearing Door No. 56-10-40, situated in R.S. No. 172/2B, Assessment No. 1073139274, located at Ganapathi Sachidananda Ashramam Road, Patamata Road, Vijayawada - 520008 and proposing for auction, as illegal, irregular, irrational and against principles of natural justice, violative of provisions of the Secularization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and Rules framed thereunder and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to decide said stay application filed by the Petitioners in SA No.667 of 2025 restraining the Respondent No. 3 from taking possession and conducting auction of said property and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent not to take possession of an RCC residential building (G+2) bearing Door No. 56-10-40, situated in RS No. 172/2B, Assessment No. 1073139274, located at Ganapathi Sachidananda

Ashramam Road, Patamata Road, Vijayawada-520008, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. PALA KARTHI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are the borrowers, who availed loan from respondent No.3-Bank. Petitioner Nos.3 to 5 are the guarantors, who offered their property as security for re-payment of the loan availed by petitioner Nos.1 and 2. As the borrowers committed default in re-payment of the loan amount, the Bank has initiated the proceedings under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short ‘SARFAESI Act’). The possession of the secured asset is sought to be taken under the SARFAESI Act. Therefore, challenging the said proceedings, the petitioners have approached the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, by way of filing S.A.No.667 of 2025 and along with the said application, they have filed an interlocutory application seeking stay of the proceedings.

3. Now, the only limited grievance of the petitioners is that even though there is an urgency to hear the stay petition and to dispose of the same that the Tribunal has posted the matter to a distant date i.e., 10.12.2025 and as there is an urgency in the matter, as the possession of the secured asset may be taken pursuant to the proceedings initiated under the SARFAESI Act at any moment of time, the petitioners sought direction to the Tribunal to dispose of the said stay application expeditiously.

4. Therefore, in view of the said limited grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, to hear the stay application in I.A.No.4246 of 2025 expeditiously and preferably on or before 04.12.2025 and dispose of the same, on merits, according to law by 04.12.2025. Till 04.12.2025, there shall be a direction to the respondent No.3-Bank not to take possession of the property. If the petitioners fail to get ready for hearing in the stay petition and co-operate with the Tribunal to dispose of the stay petition on or before 04.12.2025, the stay stands vacated without any further reference to the Court. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

Date: 19.11.2025 MDP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead