Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/19627/2025 of TUMMALA ARUNA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 16 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.19627 of 2025 Between:
APHC010387852025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
WRIT PETITION No.19627 of 2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. TUMMALA ARUNA, W/O TUMMALA MAHESH, AGE 56YRS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O 23-11-5/A, NAGESWARARAO PANTULU ROAD, SATYANARAYANA PURAM, VIJAYAWADA (URBAN) KRISHNA DISTRICT-520011
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522503.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NTR DISTRICT
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (EXCISE) DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NUTHAKKI SAARASA RAGA VARSHINI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.19627 of 2025 O R D E R: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy) The prayer and pleadings of the writ petition show that the 2nd respondent - Commissioner of Police and Additional District Magistrate, NTR District, has passed the impugned order of preventive detention and it was confirmed by the State. But, a reading of the material on record shows that the impugned order of preventive detention was in fact passed by the State itself. Though the 4th respondent, who has passed the impugned order of preventive detention, was subsequently impleaded, the prayer and pleadings were not corrected.
2. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition with correct pleadings.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, in this case shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
______________________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date: 17.11.2025 IBL
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
WRIT PETITION No.19627 of 2025
Dt: 17.11.2025 IBL