WP/4732/2015 of Gurajala Venkateswara Rao, Vs The Union of India, Rep.by its Secretary, on 16 November 2025

1. GURAJALA VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O KOTESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS RIO 12-17-18, PRAKASHNAGAR, NARASARAPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI.

2. THE UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI.

3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE , STAMPS & REGISTRATIONS, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.

4. THE REGISTRAR OF CHITS CUMTHE COMMISSIONER AND, INSPECTOR GENERAL OF STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

HYDERABAD.

5. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CHITS, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

6. KAPIL CHIT FUNDS PRIVATE LIMITED, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.NO. 3-1-631, CAPT VIJAYA RAGHUNANDAN NAGAR, KARIMNAGAR, KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT.

7. KAPIL CHITS KOSTA PRIVATE LIMITED, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.NO.40-14-3/1, CHANDRAMOULIPURAM, NEAR BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in failing to initiate action for conducting enquiry Under Section 209-A of Indian Companies Act, 1956 on the Online Complaint lodged by the Petitioner dated 6-1-2015 vide Registration No. DCOYA/E/2015/00044 against the respondents 6 and 7 for violations Under Indian Companies Act, as illegal, and arbitrary and unconstitutional and contrary to the Provisions of Chit Fund Act, 1982 and consequently, direct the respondents 1 and 2 to initiate action for prosecution and for enquiry under Section 209A of Indian Companies Act, as also under Money Laundering Laws against the respondents 6 and 7 immediately IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 6266 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents I and 2 to initiate action for prosecution and for enquiry under

Section 209A of Indian Companies Act, as also under Money Laundering Laws against the respondents 6 and 7 immediately 1 and 2 on the Online complaint of the petitioner dated 6-1-2015, pending disposal of the main Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

3. P VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

Date: 17.11.2025 ANS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 4732/2015

Date: 17.11.2025 ANS