Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/796/2020 of SARIPELLA VENKATA RAMAKRISHNAMRAJU Vs SARIPELLA ANURADHA on 13 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: 1. SARIPELLA VENKATA RAMAKRISHNAMRAJU, S/O GANAPATHIRAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YRS. HINDU, R/O
APHC010115892020
IN THE H
(
FRIDAY,THE
TWO TH
THE HONOURABL
CIVIL REVI
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SARIPELLA VE GANAPATHIRAJU A POTHUKURRU (V). I
1. SARIPELLA VENKATARAMAKRIS PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/ GOLLA YENDADA, V
2. JAGADISH THOTA, S ABOUT 43 YRS. HIN SQUARE BLVD. LAN 19446.
Counsel for the Petitioner
1. SRINIVASA RAO PAP Counsel for the Responde
1. SODUM ANVESHA
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER HOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT LE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANT ISION PETITION NO: 796 OF 2020 ENKATA RAMAKRISHNAMRAJU, AGED ABOUT 45 YRS. HINDU, R/O D NAVILLI MANDAL. E.G.DIST. ...PE AND ANURADHA, W/O SA SHNAMRAJU AGED ABOUT 40 YRS /O FLAT NO.201, MW MARINA APAR ISAKHAPATNAM. S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONE NDU, PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O NO.632, NSDALTE, PENNSYLVANIA. USA Z ...RESPON r: PPU ent(S):
[3207] TA S/O D.N0.2-12, TITIONER ARIPELLA S. HINDU, RTMENTS, ER, AGED STATION IP CODE- NDENT(S):
The Court made the following Order:
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that O.P.No.917 of 2017 was pending before the learned Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam. An order was passed by the learned Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam in respect of Interlocutory Application being I.A.No. 1485 of 2018. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam in such Interlocutory Application, the instant Civil Revision Petition has been preferred.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the main O.P.No. 917 of 2017 had already been disposed on 19.01.2022.
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, as the main O.P has already been disposed of, there is no merit to entertain the instant Civil Revision Petition.
4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition be disposed of as infructutous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
Date: 14.11.2025
KK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 796 OF 2020
14.11.2025
KK/ KS