Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/493/2020 of DHULIPALLA MAHA LAKSHMI Vs AMULOTHU KOTESWARA RAO on 13 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION Between: 1. DHULIPALLA MAHA LAKSHMI, W/O. MURALI KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. VENKATA KRISHNA
APHC010071762020
IN THE H
(
FRIDAY,THE
TWO TH
THE HONOURABL
CIVIL REVI
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. DHULIPALLA MAHA ABOUT
YEARS PEDAKAKANI MANDA
1. AMULOTHU KOTESW ABOUT 67 YEARS,R VILLAGE, ANKIREDD
2. AMULOTHU MARUTH AGED ABOUT
LALUPURAM VILLAG DISTRICT
3. AMULOTHU HANUM RAO, AGED ABOUT LALUPURAM VILLAG DISTRICT
4. ALLAM SYAMALA, W YEARS, R/O. DOO RURAL MANDAL, GU
Counsel for the Petitioner HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER HOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT LE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANT ISION PETITION NO: 493 OF 2020 LAKSHMI, W/O. MURALI KRISHNA S,
R/O. VENKATA KRISHNA AL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PE AND WARA RAO, S/O. AMULOTHU SOMUL RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.7-34, LAL DYPALEM SIVARAU, GUNTUR DISTRIC HI RAO, S/O. AMULOTHU KOTESWA YEARS,RESIDENT
OF DOOR GE, ANKIREDDYPALEM SIVARAU, MTHA RAO, S/ O. AMULOTHU KOT T 32 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DOOR GE, ANKIREDDYPALEM SIVARAU, W/O. ALLAM SRINIVASA RAO, AGED A R NO.3-82, GORANTLA VILLAGE, UNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPON r:
TA A, AGED PURARN, TITIONER LU, AGED LUPURAM CT ARA RAO, NO.7-34, GUNTUR TESWARA R NO.7-34, GUNTUR ABOUT 35 GUNTUR NDENT(S):
1. B PARAMESEWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PONNAM RAVINDRA BABU
2. TURAGA SAI SURYA The Court made the following Order:
It appears from the Order dated 15.12.2020 that learned counsel represented on behalf of the Petitioner submitted before this Court that the Respondent No.1 has expired. Learned counsel for the Petitioner was directed to take steps. No steps are not been taken.
2. Considering the situation, it appears that due to the death of the Respondent No.1, the Civil Revision Petition has become abated.
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of as abated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
Date: 14.11.2025
KK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 493 OF 2020
14.11.2025
KK/ KS