WP/34552/2017 of M/s. SLE Hospitality Management Services, Vs The Union of India on 12 November 2025

1. M/S. SLE HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES,, REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR, S. PRADEEP KUMAR, 0/O. NO. 28-B, FIRST FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD, SHASTRI NAGAR ADYAR, CHENNAI - 600 020

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP, BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.

2. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL, SOUTHERN REGION, 'C "WING, 2ND FLOOR, RAJAII BHAWAN, BESANT NAGAR, CHENNAI- 600 090

3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, VIJAYAWADA CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.G.O., COMPLEX, 4TH FLOOR, PLOT NO. B2, AUTO NAGAR, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, VIJAYAWADA - 520 007..

4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, CENTRAL-PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT C.G.O., COMPLEX, 4TH FLOOR, PLOT NO. B2, AUTO NAGAR, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, VIJAYAWADA - 520 007.

5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER TIRUPATHI CENTRAL DIVISION, CENTRAL P.W.D. OFFICE BUILDING, NEAR I.S. MAHAL ROAD, TIRUPATI 517 501

...RESPONDENT(S):

JS,J W.P.No.34552/2017

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Office Memorandum Dt. 29.9.2017 of the 3rd respondent in disqualified to participate in tendering in any of the Divisions under the circle for a period of one year as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and discriminatory and set-aside .the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 42949 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Office Memorandum Dt. 29.9.2017 of the 3rd respondents by permitting the petitioner firm to participating in the future tenders of the respondents, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the Xerox Copy of the (1) Office Orders, Dt. 22.6.2018, (2) Disqualified Price Bid Dt. 21.4.2018 (3) Channarayappa, Banglore Dt. 13.10.2017, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. P VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

JS,J W.P.No.34552/2017

The Court made the following ORDER:

Though the matter was adjourned on 10.11.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.

Today when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

The writ petition is filed questioning the Office Memorandum dated 29.09.2017 in disqualifying the petitioner to participate in the tender for a period of one (1) year.

Since one year is lapsed, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 13.11.2025

KAS

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 34552/2017

Dated: 13.11.2025 KAS