Andhra Pradesh High Court

CMA/314/2012 of SRI KOTHAPALLYU KASULU Vs THE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT & ANR on 12 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/2012 Between: 1. SRI KOTHAPALLYU KASULU, S/O.DURGALU, HINDU

APHC010409392012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/2012

Between:

1. SRI

KOTHAPALLYU

KASULU,

S/O.DURGALU,

HINDU

R/O.VEDURAPARTHI

VILLAGE,

KASIMKOTA

MANDAL,

VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

...APPELLANT

AND

1. THE

ENDOWMENTS

DEPARTMENT

ANR,

ENDOWMENTS

DEPARTMENTS O/O.VISAKHAPATNAM.

2. SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE

OFFICER O/O.KASIMKOTA [V] & [M], VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Appeal Under Section_____against ordersthe record from the AP

Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad may be called for in OA No.1676/2010 and examine the same and set aside the impugned award dated 22.11.2011 which was served on the appellant on IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 632 OF 2012

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay the operation/execution of the impugned award dated 22.11.2011 which was served on in OA No.1676/2010 [Old OA No.52/2007 of DC., Visakhapatnam] passed by the AP Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the appeal

IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CMAMP 1802 OF 2012

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the inteirm stay dt. 20/04/2012 passed in CMA.MP.no. 632 of 2012 in CMA.No. 314 of 2012

Counsel for the Appellant:

1. RAYAPROLU SRIKANTH

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR APPEALS

2. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS

3. V T M PRASAD

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT:

Learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the cause in the civil miscellaneous appeal does not survive for adjudication and the civil miscellaneous appeal has become infrucutous.

Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the appellant, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 13.11.2025 TVN

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 314/2012

Dated: 13.11.2025 TVN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead