WP/20979/2025 of SRINIVASA RAO Vs THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA on 12 November 2025

1. SRINIVASA RAO, S OCC AGRICULTU PEDAKURAPADU M

2. VIJAYA MALLESW AGED ABOVE 45 LAGADAPADU VILL

1. THE RESERVE BA 1-56, AG OFFICE R TELANGANA-04.

2. NIWAS HOUSING KNOWN AS INDOS AUTHORIZED OF KISHORE, S/O. SA AT D.NO.55-1-23 AUTONAGAR, VIJA Petition under Articl circumstances stated in pleased topleased to Issu E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEM THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G RIT PETITION NO: 20979/2025 S/O M.RAGHAVAYYA AGED ABOV URE,

D.NO.3-95, LAGADAPAD MANDAL, GUNTUR. WARI MAARTHALA,, W/O M. SRI 5 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, LAGE, PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL, ...P AND ANK OF INDIA, REP BY ITS GOVERN ROAD SAIFABAD, KHAIRATABAD, G FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED, STAR HOME FINANCE PVT. LTD.,) FICER CUM GPA HOLDER, M NKARA RAO, AGED 44 YEARS. BRA 3/B,

1ST FLOOR, BESIDE AYAWADA. ...RES le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High ue a Writ, Order or Direction, more p DESH

BER DRANATH ROY GEDELA VE 55 YEARS, DU VILLAGE, INIVASA RAO D.NO.3-95, GUNTUR. PETITIONER(S) NOR, D.NO. 6- HYDERABAD, (FORMERLY REP. BY ITS MR. KAGITHA ANCH OFFICE INDIAN OIL, SPONDENT(S): aying that in the h Court may be particularly in the

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.20979 of 2025

nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, declaring the action of the Respondents in proceeding with the auction of the Petitioners residential property as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and in violation of the mandatory provisions of the SARFAESI Act and the principles of natural justice and consequently,Set aside the auction sale dated on 8.8.2025 for the sale of petitioners property D.NO.88/1, out of ac.3-18 cents extension of 144- 2 sq.yards, Lagadapadu, pedakurapadu, palnadu District, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may to Stay all further proceedings including the proposed auction scheduled on 08.08.2025 in respect of the Petitioner's residential property, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. KORAMUTLA SALINI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.20979 of 2025

The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners today also, when the matter is called out. Their counsel, Ms. K.Salini, is also not present. As can be seen from the record, the petitioners are not turning up for hearing in this matter, which is coming on for admission from the inception. The petitioners are not turning up for hearing continuously, which is evident from the record. Therefore, it is evident that the petitioners are not evincing interest to pursue the writ petition. So, we are not inclined to further adjourn the matter.

2. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

Date: 13.11.2025 MDP