WP/40607/2016 of Gurajala Venkateswara Rao, Vs Union of India, on 11 November 2025

1. GURAJALA VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O KOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RIO 1-1.NO. 12-17-18, PRAKASHNAGAR. NARSARAOPET. GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS JOINT SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT BUILDINES, NEW DELHI.

2. THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND TELANGANA. BANDLAGUDA. HYDERABAD.

3. KAPIL INFRA AVENUES PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 40-14-3/1, CHANDRAMOULI PURAM. NEAR BENZ CIRCLE. LABBIPET, VIAJAVAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

4. KAPIL INFRA AVENUES PRIVATE LTD DEBENTURE, TRUST, REP.BY ITS TRUSTEE. REGISTERED OFFICE AT 3-1-188. VIJAY A RAGHUNANDAN NAGAR. KARININAGAR. KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus challenging the inaction of the 2nd respondent in not initiating action on the corporate fraud committed by the 3rd respondent under

JS,J W.P.No.40607/2016

the guise of illegal deposits under Bhu Adhipathi Scheme launched pursuant to o the complaints: filed by the petitioner di. 26-05-2016 vide Registration No. DCOYA/152016/01235 and dt.25-05-2016 vide Registration No. DCOYA/E/2016/01223 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the procedure o contemplated under the Indian Companies Act and consequently direct the respondents I and 2 to declare the Bhu Adhipathi Scheme launched by the 3rd: respondent, as illegal . and o inoperative and to initiate action pursuant to the complaints of the petitioner dt. 25-052016 and 26-05-2016 and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper. in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 50020 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents I and 2 to declare the Bhu Adhipathi Scheme launched by the 3rj respondent as illegal and inoperative and to initiate action pursuant to the complaints of the petitioner dt. 25-052016 and 26-05-2016 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon-ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO(SC FORCENTRL GOVT)

2. P VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY

JS,J W.P.No.40607/2016

The Court made the following ORDER:

Sri M. Janardhan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, appeared through online and submitted that no further orders are required in this writ petition.

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 12.11.2025

KAS

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 40607/2016

Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS