Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/27408/2021 of Vanthala Koteswara Rao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 11 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 27408/2021 Between: 1. VANTHALA KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. VANTHALA CHINNAYYA, AGED
APHC010454052021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VANTHALA KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. VANTHALA CHINNAYYA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC NILL, R/O. SAI NAGAR, CHINTAPALLI, MANDALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, VISAKHAPATNAM RANGE, VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. THE COMMANDANTHOME GUARDS, , VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
5. THE RESERVE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, I/C., HOME GUARDS, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of IV1andamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 in passing Removal Orders vide Proceedings No. D.No.25/2017, C.No.3359/111 /2013
dated 05-09-2017 inspite of getting Honorable acquittal in C.0 No. 300/2013, dated 25-10-2016, based on same set of charges as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21Of the Constitution of India and violation of A.P Home Guards Act 1948 and Section 7 of A.P Police Home Guard Rules 1948 and set aside the same and Consequentially direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service with the all service benefits and continuity of services and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to direct the Respondents to Suspend the operation of orders passed by Respondent No.2 vide Proceedings No. D.No. 25/2017, C.No.3359/H1/2013 dated 05-09-2017 pending disposal of the main Writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BANDI SRIHARI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following Order:
Sri Bandi Srihari, learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Date: 12.11.2025 MSI
Date: 12.11.2025 MSI