Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/7274/2015 of M/S LLOYDS SERVICES STATION, Vs INDIAN OIL COPROPRATION LTD., on 11 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7274/2015 Between: 1. M/S LLOYDS SERVICES STATION,, NO.40-13-1/2, RING ROAD,

APHC010515362015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 7274/2015

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. M/S LLOYDS SERVICES STATION,, NO.40-13-1/2, RING ROAD, CHANDRAMOULIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-520 010, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P., REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER K.SIVARAMA KRISHNA.

...PETITIONER AND

1. INDIAN OIL COPROPRATION LTD, GVR Towers, Bharathinagar, Ring Road, Vijayawada, 520010, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Chief Divisional Retail Sales Manager.

...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent in not renewing the petitioner's dealership agreement for another 5 years without assigning any reason and clarifying about the further requirements and also abrupt stoppage of petroleum supplies after 2 1/2 years from the due date as arbitrary, illegal and unjustified and consequently direct the respondent to renew the petitioner's dealership agreement for another period of 5 years in the interest of justice and to pass

JS,J W.P.No.7274/2015

IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 9677 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent restore the supplies of petroleum products to the petitioner forthwith in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. GUDURI VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent:

1. SAI SANJAY SURANENI

JS,J W.P.No.7274/2015

The Court made the following ORDER:

Ms. Kusuma Kumari, learned counsel, representing Sri G. Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 12.11.2025

KAS

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 7274/2015

Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead