Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/35358/2014 of G.Venkateswara Rao, S/o.Koteswara Rao Vs The Union of India., rep by its Secretary on 11 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 35358/2014 Between: 1. G.VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O.KOTESWARA RAO, OCC:BUSINESS,
APHC010541722014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 35358/2014
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. G.VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O.KOTESWARA RAO, OCC:BUSINESS, R/O.12-17-18, PRAKASHNAGAR,NARASARAOPSET,GUNTUR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,NEW DELHI
2. THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES KOTI HYDERABAD, -
3. KAPIL CHIT FUND PRIVATE LIMITED, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.NO.3-1-631, CAPT VIAJAY RAGHUNANDAN NAGAR, KARIMNAGAR, KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT
4. KAPIL CHIT KOSTA PRVIATE LIMITED, REP.BY ITS MANAGIGN DIRETOR, D.NO.40-14-3/1,CHANDRAMOULIPURAM, BENZ CIRCLE,VIJAYAWADA,KRISHNA DISTRICT
5. KAPIL INFRA AVENUES PVT LTD, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 3-1-188, CVRN NAGAR,KARIMNAGAR,KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT
6. RAMYA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.NO.40-14-3/1 CHANDRAMOULIPURAM, NEAR BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA,KRISHNA DISTRICT
JS,J W.P.No.35358/2014
7. M/S KAPIL FOODS AND STRUCTURES PVT LTD, REP.BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, H.NO.2-5-760, SUBEDARI, OPP:DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE,HANAMKONDA, WARANGAL DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not taking action on the complaint /representation of the petitioners dated 18.4.2013 for initiation of proceedings under Indian Companies Act 1956 against the respondents 3 to 7 for violations in diversion of funds under false scheme cheating and diversion of funds having issued compliant notices in 2013 is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the provisions of Indian companies Act 1956 and consequently direct the respondents Nos.1 to 2 to take further stepts pursuant to the show cause notices issued to the respondents 3 to 7 in the year 2013 under Indian companies Act 1956 on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner dated 18.4.2013 and to seize all the books accounts and assets of the respondents 3 to 7 for appropriate action and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 44222 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take aCTION ON THE COMPLAINTS representation of the petitioner dated 18.4.2013 for initiating appropriate action as per law against the respondetns 3 to 7 pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 52711 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the W.P. No. 35358 of 2014 by fixing an early date to meet the ends of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M JANARDHAN RAO
JS,J W.P.No.35358/2014
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
2. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO
3. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri M. Janardhan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, appeared through online and submits that cause in the writ petition does not survive.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 12.11.2025
KAS
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 35358/2014
Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS