Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/26167/2025 of LAKKIREDDY SESHI REDDY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 11 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 26167/2025 Between: 1. LAKKIREDDY SESHI REDDY, S/O. L. CHENNA REDDY, AGED 37
APHC010500102025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26167/2025
Between:
1. LAKKIREDDY SESHI REDDY, S/O. L. CHENNA REDDY, AGED 37
YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO.76-11-13/A 1ST
FLOOR, NEAR T.T.I.A.A. SCHOOL, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-
12.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WOMAN AND CHILD WELFARE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. PETITIONER
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NTR DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA.
3. THE SENIOR CITIZEN TRIBUNAL OFFICER, AND SUB DIVISIONAL
MAGISTRATE, VIJAYAWADA.
4. THE MAHILA POLICE, THE MAHILA POLICE, WARD SECRETARIAT, AYYAPPA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA EAST MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT.
5. LAKKIREDDY CHENNA REDDY, S/O. L.PAPIREDDY, AGED 67
YEARS, OCC- REAL ESTATE BUSINESS, R/O. D. NO. 74-4/1-3/6, VIJAYAWADA EAST MANDAL, TREASURY EMPLOYEES COLONY, AYYAPPA
NAGAR,
VIJAYAWADA,
NTR
DISTRICT,
PH.NO.
8790929069
6. SMT LAKKIREDDY VENKATA RAMANA, W/O. L. CHENNA REDDY, AGED 64 YEARS, OCC- REAL ESTATE BUSINESS, R/O. D. NO. 74- 4/1-3/6, VIJAYAWADA EAST MANDAL, TREASURY EMPLOYEES
COLONY, AYYAPPA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, PH.NO. 8790929069
7. LAKKIREDDY CHENNA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. L. CHENNA REDDY, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. D. NO. 74-4/1-3/6, VIJAYAWADA EAST MANDAL, TREASURY EMPLOYEES COLONY, AYYAPPA
NAGAR,
VIJAYAWADA,
NTR
DISTRICT,
PH.NO.
996622708
8. LAKKIREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O. L. CHENNA REDDY, AGED
44 YEARS, OCC- EMPLOYEE AND NRI, R/O. C/O. BUSIREDDY
VENKATA REDDY, BHAVANI SILKS, G.FLOOR, PLOT NO. 246, OPP- KONASEEMA VANTILLU, ADITYANAGAR, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD-500072, PH. 9866691235
9. LAKKIREDDY DHANESH REDDY, S/O. L. CHENNA REDDY, AGED 35
YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. D. NO. 74-4/1-3/6, VIJAYAWADA
EAST MANDAL, TREASURY EMPLOYEES COLONY, AYYAPPA
NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. PH.9032645678
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularity one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned order vide No. Rc.
A2/366/2025, passed by the 3 Respondent Dt. 23.07.2025 under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 in order to handover the rent of my residential house bearing Door No. Door No. 76- 8/3-4/1, Bhavanipuram, Vijayawada and other directions as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and set aside the same by directing the Respondents not to interfere in the personal life of the petitioner in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the rd operation of the impugned order vide No. Rc. A2/366/2025, passed by the 3 Respondent Dt. 23.07.2025 under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMANA ALLU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE
2. GP FOR SERVICES I
3. GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is stated by Sri Ramana Allu, learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause does not survive and no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition.
2. Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Date: 12.11.2025 MSI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26167/2025
Date: 12.11.2025 MSI