Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/15941/2014 of M/S. HIGHWAY COMMUTERS-LAND LOSERS RIGHTS PROTECTION WELFARE Vs SPL DY COLLECTOR, L.A. & COMPETENT AUTHORITY, VSP & ANO on 11 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 3459 PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.15941 OF 2014 Between: M/s.Highway Commuters-Land Losers Rights Protection Welfare
APHC010625372014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.15941 OF 2014
Between:
M/s.Highway Commuters-Land
Losers Rights Protection Welfare
Association, Rep. by its Secretary
and others
---
Petitioners
and
The Special Deputy Collector,
Land Acquisition and Competent
Authority, National Highway,
Visakhapatnam and another
---
Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioners
: Sri G. Rama Gopal
Counsel for the Respondents : Sri Chaudhary and Chaudhary
Advocates And Solicitors Law Firm,
Laxminarayana Alishetty &
S.S. Varma (SC for NHAI)
The Court made the following:
JS,J
WP No.15941/2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioners seeking the following relief:
“…..to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the 1st Respondent to follow the procedure under Section 3-C(2) of the National Highways Act, 1956 and consider the objections of the Petitioners by giving an opportunity of being heard which were submitted pursuant to the Notification dated 17.7.2013 as published on 31.10.2013 in the interest of justice and pass such other or further orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper …”
2. When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. However, Sri Mocherla Deepak Bhargav Ram, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents – NHAI, submits that the petitioners, without questioning the termination order, dated 13.11.2013, issued by the respondents vide proceedings No.NHAI/BOT-1/11019/102/2007/143, have filed the present Writ Petition and therefore the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
3. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
JS,J WP No.15941/2014
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:12.11.2025 DSH